Cited by 263Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Opioid UseNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Attenuation of morphine tolerance, withdrawal-induced hyperalgesia, and associated spinal inflammatory immune responses by propentofylline in rats

Raghavendra, Vasudeva, Tanga, Flobert Y, DeLeo, Joyce A·2004·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

The activation of glial cells and enhanced proinflammatory cytokine expression at the spinal cord has been implicated in the development of morphine tolerance, and morphine withdrawal-induced hyperalgesia. The present study investigated the effect of propentofylline, a glial modulator, on the expression of analgesic tolerance and withdrawal-induced hyperalgesia in chronic morphine-treated rats. Chronic morphine administration through repeated subcutaneous injection induced glial activation and enhanced proinflammatory cytokine levels at the lumbar spinal cord. Moreover, glial activation and enhanced proinflammatory cytokine levels exhibited a temporal correlation with the expression of morphine tolerance and hyperalgesia. Consistently, propentofylline attenuated the development of hyperalgesia and the expression of spinal analgesic tolerance to morphine. The administration of propentofylline during the induction of morphine tolerance also attenuated glial activation and proinflammatory cytokines at the L5 lumbar spinal cord. These results further support the hypothesis that spinal glia and proinflammatory cytokines contribute to the mechanisms of morphine tolerance and associated abnormal pain sensitivity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.npp.1300315

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raghavendra, V., Tanga, F. Y., & DeLeo, J. A.
Affiliations
Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US)
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2003-10-08
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
327-334
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2062728888
Cited by
263
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 21
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Dartmouth College
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 11276, R01DA011276)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
morphine tolerance, morphine withdrawal, propentofylline, inflammatory cytokines, chronic morphine administration, analgesic tolerance, neuropathic pain
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Drug Interactions, Drug Tolerance, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Gene Expression Regulation, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Hyperalgesia, Inflammation, Male, Morphine, Morphine Dependence, Pain Measurement, Reaction Time, RNA, Messenger, Spinal Cord, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Xanthines, Macrophage-1 Antigen, Cytokines, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Neuroprotective Agents, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review