The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The vaginal microbiome during pregnancy and the postpartum period in a European population
Open accessAbstract
The composition and structure of the pregnancy vaginal microbiome may influence susceptibility to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Studies on the pregnant vaginal microbiome have largely been limited to Northern American populations. Using MiSeq sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons, we characterised the vaginal microbiota of a mixed British cohort of women (n = 42) who experienced uncomplicated term delivery and who were sampled longitudinally throughout pregnancy (8–12, 20–22, 28–30 and 34–36 weeks gestation) and 6 weeks postpartum. We show that vaginal microbiome composition dramatically changes postpartum to become less Lactobacillus spp. dominant with increased alpha-diversity irrespective of the community structure during pregnancy and independent of ethnicity. While the pregnancy vaginal microbiome was characteristically dominated by Lactobacillus spp. and low alpha-diversity, unlike Northern American populations, a significant number of pregnant women this British population had a L. jensenii-dominated microbiome characterised by low alpha-diversity.L. jensenii was predominantly observed in women of Asian and Caucasian ethnicity whereas L. gasseri was absent in samples from Black women. This study reveals new insights into biogeographical and ethnic effects upon the pregnancy and postpartum vaginal microbiome and has important implications for future studies exploring relationships between the vaginal microbiome, host health and pregnancy outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
Host-gut microbiota metabolic interactions
Nicholson, J. K., Holmes, E., Kinross, J., Burcelin, R., Gibson, G., Jia, W., & Pettersson, S. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1223813 · Cited by 4,760
Self-citationInteractions Between the Microbiota and the Immune System
Hooper, L. V., Littman, D. R., & Macpherson, A. J. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1223490 · Cited by 4,173
Kushner (2021) · doi:10.12788/jfp · Cited by 3,799
Original Articles: Ecological Resilience, Biodiversity, and Scale
Peterson, G., Allen, C. R., & Holling, C. S. (1998) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s100219900002 · Cited by 1,547
Romero, R., Hassan, S. S., Gajer, P., Tarca, A. L., Fadrosh, D. W., Nikita, L., Galuppi, M., Lamont, R. F., Chaemsaithong, P., Miranda, J., et al. (2014) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/2049-2618-2-4 · Cited by 852
Deshmukh, H. S., Liu, Y., Menkiti, O. R., Mei, J., Dai, N., O'Leary, C. E., Oliver, P. M., Kolls, J. K., Weiser, J. N., & Worthen, G. S. (2014) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3542 · Cited by 579
Interplay between the temporal dynamics of the vaginal microbiota and human papillomavirus detection
Brotman, R. M., Shardell, M. D., Gajer, P., Tracy, J. K., Zenilman, J. M., Ravel, J., & Gravitt, P. E. (2014) · Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/jiu330 · Cited by 411
Cited by
DADA2: High–resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data
Callahan, B. J., McMurdie, P. J., Rosen, M. J., Han, A. W., Johnson, A. J. A., & Holmes, S. P. (2016) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3869 · Cited by 35,698
The central nervous system and the gut microbiome
Sharon, G., Sampson, T. R., Geschwind, D. H., & Mazmanian, S. K. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.027 · Cited by 1,513
The microbiome in early life: Implications for health outcomes
Tamburini, S., Shen, N., Wu, H. C., & Clemente, J. C. (2016) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4142 · Cited by 1,213
The vaginal microbiome and preterm birth
Fettweis, J. M., Serrano, M. G., Brooks, J. P., Edwards, D. J., Girerd, P. H., Parikh, H. I., Huang, B., Arodz, T. J., Edupuganti, L., Glascock, A. L., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0450-2 · Cited by 983
The Vaginal Microenvironment: The Physiologic Role of Lactobacilli
Amabebe, E., & Anumba, D. O. C. (2018) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2018.00181 · Cited by 785
Metadata
- Authors
- MacIntyre, D. A., Chandiramani, M., Lee, Y. S., Kindinger, L., Smith, A., Angelopoulos, N., Lehne, B., Arulkumaran, S., Brown, R., Teoh, T. G., Holmes, E., Nicoholson, J. K., Marchesi, J. R., & Bennett, P. R.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2015-03-11
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 8988-8988
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098234692
- Cited by
- 562
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 33.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The vaginal microbiome during pregnancy and the postpartum period in a European population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/srep08988
- The paper
- MacIntyre, D. A., Chandiramani, M., Lee, Y. S., Kindinger, L., Smith, A., Angelopoulos, N., Lehne, B., Arulkumaran, S., Brown, R., Teoh, T. G., Holmes, E., Nicoholson, J. K., Marchesi, J. R., & Bennett, P. R. (2015). The vaginal microbiome during pregnancy and the postpartum period in a European population. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08988
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
