Cited by 20Fungal and yeast genetics researchAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Plant Pathogen Control

De-repression of CSP-1 activates adaptive responses to antifungal azoles.

Open access
Chen, Xi, Xue, Wei, Zhou, Jun, Zhang, Zhenying, Wei, Shiping, Liu, Xingyu, Sun, Xianyun, Wang, Wenzhao +1 more·2016·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Antifungal azoles are the major drugs that are used to treat fungal infections. This study found that in response to antifungal azole stress, Neurospora crassa could activate the transcriptional responses of many genes and increase azole resistance by reducing the level of conidial separation 1 (CSP-1), a global transcription repressor, at azole-responsive genes. The expression of csp-1 was directly activated by the transcription factors WC-1 and WC-2. Upon ketoconazole (KTC) stress, the transcript levels of wc-1 and wc-2 were not changed, but csp-1 transcription rapidly declined. A chromatin immunoprecipitation-quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis revealed a rapid reduction in the WC-2 enrichment at the csp-1 promoter upon KTC treatment, which might be responsible for the KTC-induced csp-1 downregulation. Deletion of csp-1 increased resistance to KTC and voriconazole, while csp-1 overexpression increased KTC susceptibility. CSP-1 transcriptionally repressed a number of azole-responsive genes, including genes encoding the azole target ERG11, the azole efflux pump CDR4, and the sterol C-22 desaturase ERG5. Deletion of csp-1 also reduced the KTC-induced accumulation of ergosterol intermediates, eburicol, and 14α-methyl-3,6-diol. CSP-1 orthologs are widely present in filamentous fungi, and an Aspergillus fumigatus mutant in which the csp-1 was deleted was resistant to itraconazole.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep19447

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Antifungal azoles block ergosterol biosynthesis by inhibiting sterol 14α-demethylase.

    “Antifungal azoles block ergosterol biosynthesis by inhibiting sterol 14α-demethylase.”
  • Azole inhibition of sterol 14α-demethylase commonly leads to depletion of ergosterol and accumulation of other sterols, including lanosterol, eburicol and 14α-methyl-3,6-diol, within fungal cell membranes.

    “Inhibition by azoles commonly leads to depletion of ergosterol and accumulation of other sterols, such as lanosterol, eburicol and the toxic 14α-methyl-3,6-diol, within fungal cell membranes (Watson et al., 1989; Shapiro et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2016).”
  • In Ptcu-1::erg11 treated with CuSO4, ergosterol was reduced to approximately 56% of BCS-treated levels and lanosterol, eburicol and 14α-methyl-3,6-diol accumulated, similar to azole-treated N. crassa.

    “CuSO4 treatment resulted in the reduction of ergosterol to a level of approximately 56% of that treated with BCS along with the accumulation of lanosterol, eburicol and 14α-methyl-3,6-diol, similar to that found in N. crassa treated with azoles (Chen et al., 2016).”
  • Inhibition or inactivation of erg11 causes accumulation of lanosterol, eburicol and the toxic sterol 14α-methyl-3,6-diol.

    “As inhibition or inactivation of erg11 causes accumulation of lanosterol, eburicol and the toxic sterol 14α-methyl-3,6-diol (Watson et al., 1989; Chen et al., 2016) (Supplementary Figure 4 and Supplementary Table 4)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, X., Xue, W., Zhou, J., Zhang, Z., Wei, S., Liu, X., Sun, X., Wang, W., & Li, S.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Shaojie
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2016-01-19
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
19447-19447
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2396581426
Cited by
20
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (31461143002, 31371986)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
Neurospora crassa, azole antifungals, azole resistance, ketoconazole, voriconazole, WC1, transcriptional repression, ERG11, ergosterol biosynthesis, Aspergillus fumigatus, itraconazole resistance, transcriptional response
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Aspergillus fumigatus, Azoles, Fungal Proteins, Neurospora crassa, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Protein Binding, Transcription, Genetic, Down-Regulation, Gene Expression, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Gene Deletion, Drug Resistance, Fungal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review