Cited by 520Circadian rhythm and melatoninLight effects on plantsPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research

White Collar-1, a Circadian Blue Light Photoreceptor, Binding to the frequency Promoter

Open access
Froehlich, Allan C., Liu, Yi, Loros, Jennifer J., Dunlap, Jay C.·2002·Science

Abstract

In the fungus Neurospora crassa , the blue light photoreceptor(s) and signaling pathway(s) have not been identified. We examined light signaling by exploiting the light sensitivity of the Neurospora biological clock, specifically the rapid induction by light of the clock component frequency ( frq ). Light induction of frq is transcriptionally controlled and requires two cis-acting elements (LREs) in the frq promoter. Both LREs are bound by a White Collar–1 (WC-1)/White Collar–2 (WC-2)–containing complex (WCC), and light causes decreased mobility of the WCC bound to the LREs. The use of in vitro–translated WC-1 and WC-2 confirmed that WC-1, with flavin adenine dinucleotide as a cofactor, is the blue light photoreceptor that mediates light input to the circadian system through direct binding (with WC-2) to the frq promoter.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1073681

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • N. crassa WC-1 may also be a UV-responsive protein and function like C. neoformans in protecting the fungus from UV damage.

    “These data suggest that N. crassa WC-1 may also be a UV-responsive protein and function like C. neoformans in protecting the fungus from UV damage.”

    From Light Controls Growth and Development via a Conserved Pathway in the Fungal Kingdom (2005) · cites this paper as [11]

    The action-spectrum discussion (Fig. 4B; page not provided) says Neurospora light sensitivity extends into the UV, and the paper identifies WC-1 as a light photoreceptor. It does not show that WC-1 protects Neurospora from UV damage or establish a protective function analogous to one in C. neoformans. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • WC-1-FAD or the chromophore FAD alone show two equal excitation peaks, one at 370 nm (UV) and one at 450 nm (blue), overlapping the physiological action spectra.

    “In particular, the action spectra from physiological data overlap with the properties of the WC-1 protein purified from N. crassa cells, as WC-1-FAD or the chromophore FAD alone show two equal excitation peaks, one at 370 nm (UV) and one at 450 nm (blue) [11,12].”

    From Light Controls Growth and Development via a Conserved Pathway in the Fungal Kingdom (2005) · cites this paper as [11]

    Figure 4B reports an in vitro sensitivity peak at approximately 455–470 nm and says the response resembles the in vivo action spectrum. Figure 5 reports that FAD makes in vitro-expressed WC-1 light-sensitive. The paper does not report two equal excitation peaks at 370 and 450 nm for WC-1–FAD or FAD alone, or an excitation spectrum measured from WC-1 purified from N. crassa cells. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. H. Linden, P. Ballario, G. Macino, Fungal Genet. Biol. 22, 141 (1997).
  2. H. Linden, M. Rodriguez-Franco, G. Macino, Mol. Gen. Genet. 254, 111 (1997).
  3. P. Ballario et al., EMBO J. 15, 1650 (1996);
  4. H. Linden, G. Macino, EMBO J. 16, 98 (1997).
  5. P. Ballario, C. Talora, D. Galli, H. Linden, G. Macino, Mol. Microbiol. 29, 719 (1998).
  6. D. L. Denault, J. J. Loros, J. C. Dunlap, EMBO J. 20, 109 (2001).
  7. M. A. Collett, N. Garceau, J. C. Dunlap, J. J. Loros, Genetics 160, 149 (2002).
  8. K. Lee, J. J. Loros, J. C. Dunlap, in preparation. 9. W. R. Briggs, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 15, 33 (1999).
  9. J. J. Loros, J. C. Dunlap, Annu. Rev. Physiol. 63, 757 (2001).
  10. B. Aronson, K. Johnson, J. J. Loros, J. C. Dunlap, Science 263, 1578 (1994).
  11. N. Garceau, Y. Liu, J. J. Loros, J. C. Dunlap, Cell 89, 469 (1997).
  12. S. C. Crosthwaite, J. J. Loros, J. C. Dunlap, Cell 81, 1003 (1995).
  13. S. C. Crosthwaite, J. C. Dunlap, J. J. Loros, Science 276, 763 (1997).
  14. C. R. McClung, B. A. Fox, J. C. Dunlap, Nature 339, 558 (1989).
  15. C. Francis, M. L. Sargent, Plant Physiol. 64, 1000 (1979);
  16. Y. Liu, M. Merrow, J. J. Loros, J. C. Dunlap, Science 281, 825 (1998).
  17. A. C. Froehlich, J. J. Loros, J. C. Dunlap, in preparation. 18. P. Cheng, Y. Yang, C. Heintzen, Y. Liu, EMBO J. 20, 101 (2001);
  18. M. Merrow et al., EMBO J. 20, 307 (2001).
  19. A. Carattoli, S. Cogoni, G. Morelli, G. Macino, Mol. Microbiol. 13, 787 (1994).
  20. M. L. Sargent, W. R. Briggs, Plant Physiol. 42, 1504 (1967).
  21. S. Crosson, K. Moffat, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 2995 (2001).
  22. A. M. Bilwes, B. R. Crane, D. L. Denault, J. J. Loros, J. C. Dunlap, unpublished results. 24. J. Paietta, M. Sargent, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 5573 (1981);
  23. J. Paietta, M. L. Sargent, Plant Physiol. 72, 764 (1983).
  24. A. R. Cashmore, J. A. Jarillo, Y. Wu, D. Liu, Science 284, 760 (1999).
  25. M. Iseki et al., Nature 415, 1047 (2002).
  26. Q. He et al., Science, in press.
  27. S. L. Harmer, S. Panda, S. A. Kay, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 17, 215 (2001).
  28. R. Thresher et al., Science 282, 1490 (1998).
  29. K. Lee, J. J. Loros, J. C. Dunlap, Science 289, 107 (2000).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Froehlich, A. C., Liu, Y., Loros, J. J., & Dunlap, J. C.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
  • Froehlich, Allan C.
  • Liu, Yi
  • Loros, Jennifer J.
  • Dunlap, Jay C.
Venue
Science
Published
2002-08-02
Volume
297
Issue
5582
Pages
815-819
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1980988105
Cited by
520
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 21
FWCI
9.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 44651, R01MH044651)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R37GM34985, R37GM034985)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
Keywords
white collar-1, blue-light photoreceptor, Neurospora crassa, circadian clock, transcriptional regulation, light signaling
MeSH terms
Circadian Rhythm, Color, DNA-Binding Proteins, DNA, Fungal, Flavin-Adenine Dinucleotide, Flavin Mononucleotide, Fungal Proteins, Light, Neurospora crassa, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Protein Binding, RNA, Fungal, Transcription Factors, Signal Transduction, Transcriptional Activation, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Gene Deletion, Response Elements, Photoreceptors, Microbial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review