The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A novel open-porous magnesium scaffold with controllable microstructures and properties for bone regeneration
Open accessAbstract
The traditional production methods of porous magnesium scaffolds are difficult to accurately control the pore morphologies and simultaneously obtain appropriate mechanical properties. In this work, two open-porous magnesium scaffolds with different pore size but in the nearly same porosity are successfully fabricated with high-purity Mg ingots through the titanium wire space holder (TWSH) method. The porosity and pore size can be easily, precisely and individually controlled, as well as the mechanical properties also can be regulated to be within the range of human cancellous bone by changing the orientation of pores without sacrifice the requisite porous structures.In vitro cell tests indicate that the scaffolds have good cytocompatibility and osteoblastic differentiation properties.In vivo findings demonstrate that both scaffolds exhibit acceptable inflammatory responses and can be almost fully degraded and replaced by newly formed bone. More importantly, under the same porosity, the scaffolds with larger pore size can promote early vascularization and up-regulate collagen type 1 and OPN expression, leading to higher bone mass and more mature bone formation. In conclusion, a new method is introduced to develop an open-porous magnesium scaffold with controllable microstructures and mechanical properties, which has great potential clinical application for bone reconstruction in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biomechanics of cellular solids
Gibson, L. J. (2005) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.09.027 · Cited by 961
Role of magnesium in the binding of tetracycline to Escherichia coli ribosomes
White, J. P., & Cantor, C. R. (1971) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(71)90255-5 · Cited by 59
Cited by
Recent advances in biomaterials for 3D scaffolds: A review
Nikolova, M. P., & Chavali, M. S. (2019) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.10.005 · Cited by 907
Bone biomaterials and interactions with stem cells
Gao, C., Peng, S., Feng, P., & Shuai, C. (2017) · Bone Research · doi:10.1038/boneres.2017.59 · Cited by 720
Zhu, G., Zhang, T., Chen, M., Yao, K., Huang, X., Zhang, B., Li, Y., Liu, J., Wang, Y., & Zhao, Z. (2021) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.03.043 · Cited by 494
Additively manufactured biodegradable porous magnesium
Li, Y., Zhou, J., Pavanram, P., Leeflang, M. A., Fockaert, L. I., Pouran, B., Tümer, N., Schröder, K.-U., Mol, J. M. C., Weinans, H., et al. (2018) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.12.008 · Cited by 396
Scaffolds for bone-tissue engineering
Lee, S. S., Du, X., Kim, I., & Ferguson, S. J. (2022) · Matter · doi:10.1016/j.matt.2022.06.003 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheng, M.-Q., Wahafu, T., Jiang, G.-F., Liu, W., Qiao, Y.-Q., Peng, X.-C., Cheng, T., Zhang, X.-L., He, G., & Liu, X.-Y.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2016-04-13
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24134-24134
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2341221840
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A novel open-porous magnesium scaffold with controllable microstructures and properties for bone regeneration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/srep24134
- The paper
- Cheng, M.-Q., Wahafu, T., Jiang, G.-F., Liu, W., Qiao, Y.-Q., Peng, X.-C., Cheng, T., Zhang, X.-L., He, G., & Liu, X.-Y. (2016). A novel open-porous magnesium scaffold with controllable microstructures and properties for bone regeneration. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24134
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.