Cited by 69Thermoregulation and physiological responsesEffects of Environmental Stressors on LivestockNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Suppression of cognitive function in hyperthermia; from the viewpoint of executive and inhibitive cognitive processing

Open access
Shibasaki, Manabu, Namba, Mari, Oshiro, Misaki, Kakigi, Ryusuke, Nakata, Hiroki·2017·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Climate change has had a widespread impact on humans and natural systems. Heat stroke is a life-threatening condition in severe environments. The execution or inhibition of decision making is critical for survival in a hot environment. We hypothesized that, even with mild heat stress, not only executive processing, but also inhibitory processing may be impaired, and investigated the effectiveness of body cooling approaches on these processes using the Go/No-go task with electroencephalographic event-related potentials. Passive heat stress increased esophageal temperature (Tes) by 1.30 ± 0.24 °C and decreased cerebral perfusion and thermal comfort. Mild heat stress reduced the amplitudes of the Go-P300 component (i.e. execution) and No-go-P300 component (i.e. inhibition). Cerebral perfusion and thermal comfort recovered following face/head cooling, however, the amplitudes of the Go-P300 and No-go-P300 components remained reduced. During whole-body cooling, the amplitude of the Go-P300 component returned to the pre-heat baseline, whereas that of the No-go-P300 component remained reduced. These results suggest that local cooling of the face and head does not restore impaired cognitive processing during mild heat stress, and response inhibition remains impaired despite the return to normothermia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep43528

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Field C. B., Barros V. R. & Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Working Group II. Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability: Working Group II contribution to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (Cambridge University Press) (2014).
  2. McMichael A. J. Globalization, climate change, and human health. N Engl J Med 368, 1335– 1343, doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1109341 (2013). 23550671 · DOI
  3. Petoukhov V., Rahmstorf S., Petri S. & Schellnhuber H. J. Quasiresonant amplification of planetary waves and recent Northern Hemisphere weather extremes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, 5336– 5341, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1222000110 (2013). 23457264 PMC3619331 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Patz J. A., Frumkin H., Holloway T., Vimont D. J. & Haines A. Climate change: challenges and opportunities for global health. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association 312, 1565– 1580, doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.13186 (2014). 25244362 PMC6108836 · DOI
  5. Crandall C. G. & Wilson T. E. Human cardiovascular responses to passive heat stress. Comprehensive Physiology 5, 17– 43, doi: 10.1002/cphy.c140015 (2015). 25589263 PMC4950975 · DOI
  6. Gaoua N. Cognitive function in hot environments: a question of methodology. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports 20 Suppl 3, 60– 70, doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01210.x (2010). 21029192 · DOI
  7. Xia W.. Disrupted resting-state attentional networks in T2DM patients. Sci Rep 5, 11148, doi: 10.1038/srep11148 (2015). 26053355 PMC4459168 · DOI
  8. Brothers R. M., Wingo J. E., Hubing K. A. & Crandall C. G. The effects of reduced end-tidal carbon dioxide tension on cerebral blood flow during heat stress. The Journal of physiology 587, 3921– 3927 (2009). 19528251 PMC2746619
  9. Fujii N.. Effects of chemoreflexes on hyperthermic hyperventilation and cerebral blood velocity in resting heated humans. Experimental physiology 93, 994– 1001, doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2008.042143 (2008). 18403444 · DOI
  10. Wilson T. E., Cui J., Zhang R. & Crandall C. G. Heat stress reduces cerebral blood velocity and markedly impairs orthostatic tolerance in humans. American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology 291, R1443– 1448, doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00712.2005 (2006). PMC2442822 16763078 · DOI
  11. Cabanac M. Physiological role of pleasure. Science 173, 1103– 1107 (1971). 5098954
  12. Nakamura M.. Regional differences in temperature sensation and thermal comfort in humans. Journal of applied physiology 105, 1897– 1906, doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90466.2008 (2008). 18845785 · DOI
  13. Ogoh S.. Blood flow distribution during heat stress: cerebral and systemic blood flow. Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism: official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 33, 1915– 1920, doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2013.149 (2013). PMC3851900 23942362 · DOI
  14. Diamond A. Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol 64, 135– 168, doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750 (2013). 23020641 PMC4084861 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Hocking C., Silberstein R. B., Lau W. M., Stough C. & Roberts W. Evaluation of cognitive performance in the heat by functional brain imaging and psychometric testing. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 128, 719– 734 (2001). 11282316
  16. Hancock P. A. & Vasmatzidis I. Effects of heat stress on cognitive performance: the current state of knowledge. International journal of hyperthermia: the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group 19, 355– 372, doi: 10.1080/0265673021000054630 (2003). 12745975 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Racinais S., Gaoua N. & Grantham J. Hyperthermia impairs short-term memory and peripheral motor drive transmission. The Journal of physiology 586, 4751– 4762, doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.157420 (2008). 18703579 PMC2607529 · DOI
  18. Bain A. R., Nybo L. & Ainslie P. N. Cerebral Vascular Control and Metabolism in Heat Stress. Comprehensive Physiology 5, 1345– 1380, doi: 10.1002/cphy.c140066 (2015). 26140721 · DOI
  19. Shibasaki M., Namba M., Oshiro M., Crandall C. G. & Nakata H. The effect of elevations in internal temperature on event-related potentials during a simple cognitive task in humans. American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology 311, R33– 38, doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00086.2016 (2016). 27101295 · DOI
  20. Kok A. On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology 38, 557– 577 (2001). 11352145
  21. Salisbury D. F., Griggs C. B., Shenton M. E. & McCarley R. W. The NoGo P300 ‘anteriorization’ effect and response inhibition. Clinical neurophysiology: official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology 115, 1550– 1558, doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.01.028 (2004). 15203056 PMC2706017 · DOI
  22. Herrmann M. J., Walter A., Ehlis A. C. & Fallgatter A. J. Cerebral oxygenation changes in the prefrontal cortex: effects of age and gender. Neurobiol Aging 27, 888– 894, doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.04.013 (2006). 16023767 · DOI
  23. Bruin K. J., Wijers A. A. & van Staveren A. S. Response priming in a go/nogo task: do we have to explain the go/nogo N2 effect in terms of response activation instead of inhibition? Clinical neurophysiology: official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology 112, 1660– 1671 (2001). 11514249
  24. Falkenstein M., Hoormann J. & Hohnsbein J. ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychol (Amst) 101, 267– 291 (1999). 10344188
  25. Smith J. L., Johnstone S. J. & Barry R. J. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict. Clinical neurophysiology: official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology 118, 343– 355, doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.09.027 (2007). 17140848 · DOI
  26. Garavan H., Ross T. J. & Stein E. A. Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96, 8301– 8306 (1999). 10393989 PMC22229
  27. Humberstone M.. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of single motor events reveals human presupplementary motor area. Ann Neurol 42, 632– 637, doi: 10.1002/ana.410420414 (1997). 9382475 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Konishi S.. Common inhibitory mechanism in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by event-related functional MRI. Brain 122(Pt 5), 981– 991 (1999). 10355680
  29. Nakata H.. Somato-motor inhibitory processing in humans: an event-related functional MRI study. Neuroimage 39, 1858– 1866, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.041 (2008). 18083602 · DOI
  30. Nakata H.. Executive functions with different motor outputs in somatosensory Go/Nogo tasks: an event-related functional MRI study. Brain Res Bull 77, 197– 205, doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.07.008 (2008). 18722517 · DOI
  31. Nakata H., Sakamoto K., Honda Y. & Kakigi R. Temporal dynamics of neural activity in motor execution and inhibition processing. Eur J Neurosci 41, 1448– 1458, doi: 10.1111/ejn.12889 (2015). 25850961 · DOI
  32. Nunneley S. A.. Changes in regional cerebral metabolism during systemic hyperthermia in humans. J Appl Physiol 92, 846– 851, doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00072.2001 (2002). 11796700 · DOI
  33. Augustine J. R. Circuitry and functional aspects of the insular lobe in primates including humans. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 22, 229– 244 (1996). 8957561
  34. Taylor W. F., Johnson J. M., Kosiba W. A. & Kwan C. M. Cutaneous vascular responses to isometric handgrip exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 66, 1586– 1592 (1989). 2732150

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shibasaki, M., Namba, M., Oshiro, M., Kakigi, R., & Nakata, H.
Affiliations
  • Nara Women's University (JP)
  • National Institute for Physiological Sciences (JP)
Corresponding author
Shibasaki, Manabu
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2017-03-07
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
43528-43528
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2613532298
Cited by
69
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Nipro
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15H02889, 15H05361)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
hyperthermia, heat stress, executive function, response inhibition, P300, go/no-go task, event-related potentials, body cooling, whole-body cooling, cerebral perfusion, thermal comfort, heatstroke, cognitive impairment
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Temperature, Body Temperature Regulation, Cognition, Head, Hemodynamics, Humans, Male, Reaction Time, Regional Blood Flow, Heat Stress Disorders, Event-Related Potentials, P300, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review