Cited by 37Pluripotent Stem Cells Research3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchCellular Mechanics and Interactions

Multiscale microenvironmental perturbation of pluripotent stem cell fate and self-organization

Open access
Tabata, Yoji, Lutolf, Matthias P.·2017·Scientific Reports

Abstract

The combination of microfluidics with engineered three-dimensional (3D) matrices can bring new insights into the fate regulation of stem cells and their self-organization into organoids. Although there has been progress in 3D stem cell culturing, most existing in vitro methodologies do not allow for mimicking of the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of stimuli that drive morphogenetic processes in vivo. To address this, we present a perfusion-free microchip concept for the in vitro 3D perturbation of stem cell fate. Stem cells are encapsulated in a hydrogel compartment that is flanked by open reservoirs for the diffusion-driven generation of biomolecule gradients. Juxtaposing additional compartments bearing supportive cells enables investigating the influence of long range cell-cell communication. We explore the utility of the microchips in manipulating early fate choices and self-organizing characteristics of 3D-cultured mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) under neural differentiation conditions and exposure to gradients of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF). mESCs respond to LIF gradients in a spatially dependent manner. At higher LIF concentrations, multicellular colonies maintain pluripotency in contrast, at lower concentrations, mESCs develop into apicobasally polarized epithelial cysts. This versatile system can help to systematically explore the role of multifactorial microenvironments in promoting self-patterning of various stem cell types.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep44711

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Manipulating synthetic hydrogels using methods such as electrospinning, photopatterning, spraying of microspheres, inkjet and 3D printing, or microfluidic channels enables control over the shape and size of the organoids.

    “Manipulating synthetic hydrogels using methods such as electrospinning125, photopatterning126,127, spraying of microspheres128, inkjet and 3D printing129, or microfluidic channels130 further enables control over the shape and size of the organoids.”

    From Towards organoid culture without Matrigel (2021) · cites this paper as [130]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kawada J., Kimura H., Akutsu H., Sakai Y. & Fujii T. Spatiotemporally controlled delivery of soluble factors for stem cell differentiation. Lab Chip 12, 4508– 4515, doi: 10.1039/c2lc40268h (2012). 22968416 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tabata, Y., & Lutolf, M. P.
Affiliations
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2017-03-17
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
44711-44711
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2595041682
Cited by
37
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
Keywords
organoids, microfluidics, hydrogel encapsulation, mouse embryonic stem cells, neuronal differentiation, leukemia inhibitory factor, apical-basal polarity, epithelial cysts, intercellular communication, self-patterning
MeSH terms
Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells, Animals, Cells, Cultured, Diffusion, Extracellular Matrix, Solubility, Cell Lineage, Pluripotent Stem Cells, Microfluidics, Mice, Leukemia Inhibitory Factor, Microtechnology, Cellular Microenvironment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review