Cited by 14Neurological disorders and treatmentsMental Health Research TopicsDigital Mental Health Interventions

High-frequency measurement of depressive severity in a patient treated for severe treatment-resistant depression with deep-brain stimulation

Open access
Sani, S, Busnello, J, Kochanski, R, Cohen, Y, Gibbons, R D·2017·Translational Psychiatry

Abstract

Although there have been previous studies of deep-brain stimulation (DBS), we present, to our knowledge, the first example of high-frequency depressive severity measurement-based DBS treatment in particular and psychiatric treatment in general. Daily post-surgical e-mail prompts for a period of 6 months resulted in 93 administrations of a computerized adaptive test (CAT) of depression severity (CAT-Depression Inventory or CAT-DI) via the internet. There was an average of 3.37 weekly measurements with an average separation of 2.12 days. No additional incentive was provided to the patient for completing the adaptive tests. The patient is a 55-year-old female with six psychiatric hospitalizations for depression, two suicide attempts, marginal response to eight electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) treatments and 35 psychotropic medications. We report results after high-frequency stimulation of the superolateral branch of the medial forebrain bundle. The CAT-DI was used for daily assessments before, during and after (remotely in response to an e-mail prompt) the DBS procedure. Two follow-up Hamilton Depression Scales (HAM-Ds) were also collected. Response to treatment varied markedly, with a decrease from severe (>75) to mild (60), which is three times the size of the uncertainty level. Although the HAM-D scores decreased, they missed the more complete temporal pattern identified by CAT-DI daily monitoring. We demonstrated feasibility of daily depressive severity measurement at high levels of precision and compliance. Clinician ratings confirm the general pattern of treatment benefit, but mask the marked variability in mood and more marked periods of benefit and decline.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/tp.2017.145

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a case study, the HDRS-measured effect of MFB DBS was masked by mood variability and by more marked periods of benefit and decline measured with CAT-DI.

    “in a case study, the effect of MFB DBS measured with the HDRS was masked by the variability in mood and more marked periods of benefit and decline measured with a computerized adaptive test (CAT-DI)”

    From Deep brain stimulation for depression. (2022) · cites this paper as [13]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sani, S., Busnello, J., Kochanski, R., Cohen, Y., & Gibbons, R. D.
Affiliations
  • Rush University (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Gibbons, R D
Venue
Translational Psychiatry
Published
2017-08-15
Volume
7
Issue
8
Pages
e1207-e1207
ISSN
2158-3188 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2750396313
Cited by
14
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Translational Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH066302)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
deep brain stimulation, treatment-resistant depression, computerized adaptive testing, remote patient monitoring, medial forebrain bundle, treatment response variability, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Medial Forebrain Bundle, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Telemedicine, Deep Brain Stimulation, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review