Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 534

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The bite angle makes the difference: a practical ligand parameter for diphosphine ligands

Dierkes, Peter, van Leeuwen, Piet W. N. M.·1999·Journal of the Chemical Society, Dalton Transactions

Abstract

Over the past twenty years, a correlation between the P–M–P bite angle in diphosphine complexes and selectivity has been observed in various catalytic reactions such as hydroformylation, hydrocyanation and cross coupling. The large number of examples indicates that this correlation is not fortuitous. In order better to understand the underlying principles of the bite angle effect, we have first analysed crystal structures available in the Cambridge Crystallographic Database. Systematic searches indicate that for many bidentate diphosphine ligands the P–M–P angles concentrate in surprisingly small ranges, even if complexes of different metals in various oxidation states are considered. Several examples in the literature show that continuous electronic changes associated with changing bite angles cannot only be verified by different spectroscopic techniques, but also explained on a theoretical level (Walsh diagrams). The ligand bite angle is a useful parameter for the explanation of observed rates and selectivities and likewise for the design of ligands for new catalytic reactions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/a807799a

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 534

Metadata

Authors
Dierkes, P., & van Leeuwen, P. W. N. M.
Venue
Journal of the Chemical Society, Dalton Transactions
Published
1999
Issue
10
Pages
1519-1530
ISSN
  • 1364-5447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0300-9246
OpenAlex
W2096864437
Cited by
534
References
1
FWCI
13.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.