The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analytical methods to assess nanoparticle toxicity
Abstract
During the past 20 years, improvements in nanoscale materials synthesis and characterization have given scientists great control over the fabrication of materials with features between 1 and 100 nm, unlocking many unique size-dependent properties and, thus, promising many new and/or improved technologies. Recent years have found the integration of such materials into commercial goods; a current estimate suggests there are over 800 nanoparticle-containing consumer products (The Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies Consumer Products Inventory, , accessed Oct. 2008), accounting for 147 billion USD in products in 2007 (Nanomaterials state of the market Q3 2008: stealth success, broad impact, Lux Research Inc., New York, NY, 2008). Despite this increase in the prevalence of engineered nanomaterials, there is little known about their potential impacts on environmental health and safety. The field of nanotoxicology has formed in response to this lack of information and resulted in a flurry of research studies. Nanotoxicology relies on many analytical methods for the characterization of nanomaterials as well as their impacts on in vitro and in vivo function. This review provides a critical overview of these techniques from the perspective of an analytical chemist, and is intended to be used as a reference for scientists interested in conducting nanotoxicological research as well as those interested in nanotoxicological assay development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Factors affecting the clearance and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles
Alexis, F., Pridgen, E., Molnar, L. K., & Farokhzad, O. C. (2008) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/mp800051m · Cited by 3,699
Halliwell, B., & Whiteman, M. (2004) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0705776 · Cited by 2,238
ACTION OF X-RAYS ON MAMMALIAN CELLS
Puck, T. T., & Marcus, P. I. (1956) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.103.5.653 · Cited by 1,696
Brunner, T. J., Wick, P., Manser, P., Spohn, P., Grass, R. N., Limbach, L. K., Bruinink, A., & Stark, W. J. (2006) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es052069i · Cited by 1,385
Donaldson, K., Aitken, R., Tran, L., Stone, V., Duffin, R., Forrest, G., & Alexander, A. (2006) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfj130 · Cited by 1,167
Selective fluorescent imaging of superoxide in vivo using ethidium-based probes
Robinson, K. M., Janes, M. S., Pehar, M., Monette, J. S., Ross, M. F., Hagen, T. M., Murphy, M. P., & Beckman, J. S. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601945103 · Cited by 777
Hempel, S. L., Buettner, G. R., O’Malley, Y. Q., Wessels, D. A., & Flaherty, D. M. (1999) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0891-5849(99)00061-1 · Cited by 740
In vivo evaluation of polymeric micellar paclitaxel formulation: toxicity and efficacy
Kim, S. C., Kim, D. W., Shim, Y. H., Bang, J. S., Oh, H. S., Kim, S. W., & Seo, M. H. (2001) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/s0168-3659(01)00275-9 · Cited by 734
Direct imaging of single-walled carbon nanotubes in cells
Porter, A. E., Gass, M., Muller, K., Skepper, J. N., Midgley, P. A., & Welland, M. (2007) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.347 · Cited by 564
PEGylated PLGA nanoparticles as protein carriers: Synthesis, preparation and biodistribution in rats
Li, Y.-P., Pei, Y.-Y., Zhang, X.-Y., Gu, Z.-H., Zhou, Z.-H., Yuan, W.-F., Zhou, J.-J., Zhu, J.-H., & Gao, X.-J. (2001) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/s0168-3659(01)00218-8 · Cited by 540
Cited by
Yallapu, M. M., Gupta, B. K., Jaggi, M., & Chauhan, S. C. (2010) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2010.05.022 · Cited by 579
Toxicity assessment of nanomaterials: methods and challenges
Dhawan, A., & Sharma, V. (2010) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-010-3996-x · Cited by 466
Cytotoxicity and oxidative stress induced by different metallic nanoparticles on human kidney cells
Pujalté, I., Passagne, I., Brouillaud, B., Tréguer, M., Durand, E., Ohayon-Courtès, C., & L'Azou, B. (2011) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/1743-8977-8-10 · Cited by 398
Anti-oxidant effect of gold nanoparticles restrains hyperglycemic conditions in diabetic mice
BarathManiKanth, S., Kalishwaralal, K., Sriram, M., Pandian, S. R. K., Youn, H.-S., Eom, S., & Gurunathan, S. (2010) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/1477-3155-8-16 · Cited by 386
Neurotoxicity of Silica Nanoparticles: Brain Localization and Dopaminergic Neurons Damage Pathways
Wu, J., Wang, C., Sun, J., & Xue, Y. (2011) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn103530b · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Marquis, B. J., Love, S. A., Braun, K. L., & Haynes, C. L.
- Venue
- The Analyst
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 425
- ISSN
- 0003-2654 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5528
- OpenAlex
- W2156406953
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 17.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analytical methods to assess nanoparticle toxicity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b818082b
- The paper
- Marquis, B. J., Love, S. A., Braun, K. L., & Haynes, C. L. (2009). Analytical methods to assess nanoparticle toxicity. The Analyst. https://doi.org/10.1039/b818082b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
