The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pitfalls in the characterization of nanoporous and nanosized materials
Abstract
With the advent of highly sophisticated analytical tools, numerous physical methods are nowadays available for comprehensive characterization of inorganic matter and, as special cases, of porous and nanosized materials. Intelligent experimental setup and correct evaluation of the experimental data can provide helpful insights into the chemical and physical properties of such materials. However, scanning of literature reports shows that in many cases evaluation and interpretation of experimental data are erroneous. As a result, the description of a new material can be useless or even worse, misleading. Wrong evaluation is even more critical if mechanistic theories are based on such data. Characterization of porous and/or nanosized materials is mainly performed by gas adsorption, X-ray powder diffraction, electron microscopy and surface spectroscopy. For correct interpretation of experimental data one should be aware of certain pitfalls. The present paper summarizes prominent faults and may show how they can be avoided. It is supposed to provide some hand-on knowledge on correct analysis of materials. Addressed are primarily non-experts and researchers being new to the field of characterization of inorganic nanosized or nanoporous materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sing, K. S. W. (1985) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1351/pac198557040603 · Cited by 24,485
A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures
Rietveld, H. M. (1969) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0021889869006558 · Cited by 17,524
Barrett, E. P., Joyner, L. G., & Halenda, P. P. (1951) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01145a126 · Cited by 13,172
X-ray line broadening from filed aluminium and wolfram
Williamson, G. K., & Hall, W. H. (1953) · Acta Metallurgica · doi:10.1016/0001-6160(53)90006-6 · Cited by 10,530
Line profiles of neutron powder-diffraction peaks for structure refinement
Rietveld, H. M. (1967) · Acta Crystallographica · doi:10.1107/s0365110x67000234 · Cited by 3,660
Groen, J. C., Peffer, L. A. A., & Pérez-Ramı́rez, J. (2003) · Microporous and Mesoporous Materials · doi:10.1016/s1387-1811(03)00339-1 · Cited by 2,131
X-ray photoelectron studies on some oxides and hydroxides of cobalt, nickel, and copper
McIntyre, N. S., & Cook, M. G. (1975) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac60363a034 · Cited by 1,837
The reflection of X-rays by crystals
Bragg, W. H., & Bragg, W. L. (1913) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character · doi:10.1098/rspa.1913.0040 · Cited by 1,462
The Effect of Cold-Work Distortion on X-Ray Patterns
Warren, B. E., & Averbach, B. L. (1950) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1699713 · Cited by 1,406
The effect of dislocation contrast on x-ray line broadening: A new approach to line profile analysis
Ungár, T., & Borbély, A. (1996) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.117951 · Cited by 1,378
Cited by
Synthesis, Structure, Properties, and Applications of Bimetallic Nanoparticles of Noble Metals
Loza, K., Heggen, M., & Epple, M. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201909260 · Cited by 499
Metadata
- Authors
- Weidenthaler, C.
- Venue
- Nanoscale
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 792
- ISSN
- 2040-3364 (ISSN-L)
- 2040-3372
- OpenAlex
- W2112027085
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 3.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pitfalls in the characterization of nanoporous and nanosized materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c0nr00561d
- The paper
- Weidenthaler, C. (2011). Pitfalls in the characterization of nanoporous and nanosized materials. Nanoscale. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0nr00561d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.