Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 556

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular motion and ion diffusion in choline chloride based deep eutectic solvents studied by 1H pulsed field gradient NMR spectroscopy

D'Agostino, Carmine, Harris, Robert C., Abbott, Andrew P., Gladden, Lynn F., Mantle, Mick D.·2011·Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Abstract

Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs) are a novel class of solvents with potential industrial applications in separation processes, chemical reactions, metal recovery and metal finishing processes such as electrodeposition and electropolishing. Macroscopic physical properties such as viscosity, conductivity, eutectic composition and surface tension are already available for several DESs, but the microscopic transport properties for this class of compounds are not well understood and the literature lacks experimental data that could give a better insight into the understanding of such properties. This paper presents the first pulsed field gradient nuclear magnetic resonance (PFG-NMR) study of DESs. Several choline chloride based DESs were chosen as experimental samples, each of them with a different associated hydrogen bond donor. The molecular equilibrium self-diffusion coefficient of both the choline cation and hydrogen bond donor was probed using a standard stimulated echo PFG-NMR pulse sequence. It is shown that the increasing temperature leads to a weaker interaction between the choline cation and the correspondent hydrogen bond donor. The self-diffusion coefficients of the samples obey an Arrhenius law temperature-dependence, with values of self-diffusivity in the range of [10(-10)-10(-13) m(2) s(-1)]. In addition, the results also highlight that the molecular structure of the hydrogen bond donor can greatly affect the mobility of the whole system. While for ethaline, glyceline and reline the choline cation diffuses slower than the associated hydrogen bond donor, reflecting the trend of molecular size and molecular weight, the opposite behaviour is observed for maline, in which the hydrogen bond donor, i.e. malonic acid, diffuses slower than the choline cation, with self-diffusion coefficients values of the order of 10(-13) m(2) s(-1) at room temperature, which are remarkably low values for a liquid. This is believed to be due to the formation of extensive dimer chains between malonic acid molecules, which restricts the mobility of the whole system at low temperature (<30 °C), with malonic acid and choline chloride having almost identical diffusivity values. Diffusion and viscosity data were combined together to gain insights into the diffusion mechanism, which was found to be the same as for ionic liquids with discrete anions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c1cp22554e

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Hallett, 2011, Chem. Rev., 111, 3508, 10.1021/cr1003248 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Smith, 2010, Trans. Inst. Met. Finish., 88, 285, 10.1179/174591910X12856686485734 · DOI
  3. Abbott, 2007, Green Chem., 9, 868, 10.1039/b702833d · DOI · Paper page
  4. Sheu, 2006, Inorg. Chem., 45, 1891, 10.1021/ic0518475 · DOI
  5. Taylor, 2011, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 13, 10147, 10.1039/c1cp20373h · DOI
  6. Lloyd, 2011, Electrochim. Acta, 56, 4942, 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.03.133 · DOI
  7. Pregosin, 2006, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc., 49, 261, 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2006.09.001 · DOI
  8. Stillinger, 1994, Phys. Rev. E: Stat. Phys., Plasmas, Fluids, Relat. Interdiscip. Top., 50, 2064, 10.1103/PhysRevE.50.2064 · doi:10.1103/physreve.50.2064
  9. Stejskal, 1965, J. Chem. Phys., 42, 288, 10.1063/1.1695690 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Bowron, 2010, J. Phys. Chem. B, 114, 7760, 10.1021/jp102180q · DOI
  11. Hayamizu, 2008, J. Phys. Chem. B, 112, 1189, 10.1021/jp077714h · doi:10.1021/jp077714h
  12. Hayamizu, 2008, J. Phys. Chem., 112, 12027, 10.1021/jp802392t · doi:10.1021/jp802392t
  13. Aihara, 2000, Electrochim. Acta, 45, 1321, 10.1016/S0013-4686(99)00339-4 · doi:10.1016/s0013-4686(99)00339-4
  14. Aihara, 2000, J. Chem. Phys., 113, 1981, 10.1063/1.482004 · DOI
  15. Noda, 2001, J. Phys. Chem. B, 105, 4603, 10.1021/jp004132q · DOI · Paper page
  16. Tanner, 1970, J. Chem. Phys., 52, 2523, 10.1063/1.1673336 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Han, 1997, Bull. Kor. Chem. Soc., 18, 271
  18. Abbott, 2007, J. Phys. Chem. B, 111, 4910, 10.1021/jp0671998 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Abbott, 2006, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 51, 1280, 10.1021/je060038c · DOI · Paper page
  20. Chmielewska, 2008, J. Mol. Liq., 137, 116, 10.1016/j.molliq.2007.05.002 · DOI
  21. Abbott, 2011, Green Chem., 13, 82, 10.1039/C0GC00395F · DOI · Paper page
  22. Dlubek, 2010, J. Chem. Phys., 133, 124502, 10.1063/1.3487522 · DOI

Cited by

See all 556

Metadata

Authors
D'Agostino, C., Harris, R. C., Abbott, A. P., Gladden, L. F., & Mantle, M. D.
Venue
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Published
2011
Volume
13
Issue
48
Pages
21383
ISSN
  • 1463-9076 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-9084
OpenAlex
W2093262129
Cited by
556
References
3
FWCI
2.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular motion and ion diffusion in choline chloride based deep eutectic solvents studied by 1H pulsed field gradient NMR spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c1cp22554e
The paper
D'Agostino, C., Harris, R. C., Abbott, A. P., Gladden, L. F., & Mantle, M. D. (2011). Molecular motion and ion diffusion in choline chloride based deep eutectic solvents studied by 1H pulsed field gradient NMR spectroscopy. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cp22554e

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.