The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Design criteria for electrochemical shock resistant battery electrodes
Abstract
Mechanical degradation of electrode active materials (“electrochemical shock”) contributes to impedance growth of battery electrodes, but relatively few design criteria have been developed to mitigate fracture. Using micromechanical models and in situ acoustic emission experiments, we demonstrate and explain C-rate independent electrochemical shock in polycrystalline electrode materials with anisotropic Vegard coefficients. We conclude that minimizing the principal shear strain, rather than minimizing net volume change as previously suggested, is an important new design criterion for crystal chemical engineering of electrode materials for mechanical reliability. Polycrystalline particles of anisotropic Li-storage materials should be synthesized with primary crystallite sizes smaller than a material-specific critical size to avoid fracture along grain boundaries. Finally, we revise the electrochemical shock map construction to incorporate the material-specific critical microstructure feature sizes for C-rate independent electrochemical shock mechanisms, providing a simple tool for designing long-lived battery electrodes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ageing mechanisms in lithium-ion batteries
Vetter, J., Novák, P., Wagner, M. R., Veit, C., Möller, K.-C., Besenhard, J. O., Winter, M., Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, M., Vogler, C., & Hammouche, A. (2005) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.006 · Cited by 3,987
Capacity Fade Mechanisms and Side Reactions in Lithium‐Ion Batteries
Arora, P., White, R. E., & Doyle, M. (1998) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1838857 · Cited by 1,408
Stress generation and fracture in lithium insertion materials
Christensen, J., & Newman, J. (2006) · Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10008-006-0095-1 · Cited by 727
Cited by
Lithium-ion battery fast charging: A review
Tomaszewska, A., Chu, Z., Feng, X., O'Kane, S., Liu, X., Chen, J., Ji, C., Endler, E., Li, R., Liu, L., et al. (2019) · eTransportation · doi:10.1016/j.etran.2019.100011 · Cited by 1,592
Placke, T., Kloepsch, R., Dühnen, S., & Winter, M. (2017) · Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10008-017-3610-7 · Cited by 1,117
Li, J., Fleetwood, J., Hawley, W. B., & Kays, W. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00565 · Cited by 895
Radin, M. D., Hy, S., Sina, M., Fang, C., Liu, H., Vinckeviciute, J., Zhang, M., Whittingham, M. S., Meng, Y. S., & Van der Ven, A. (2017) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201602888 · Cited by 677
Calendar Aging of Lithium-Ion Batteries: I. Impact of the Graphite Anode on Capacity Fade
Keil, P., Schuster, S. F., Wilhelm, J., Travi, J., Hauser, A., Karl, R. C., & Jossen, A. (2016) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/2.0411609jes · Cited by 669
Metadata
- Authors
- Woodford, W. H., Carter, W. C., & Chiang, Y.-M.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 8014
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2164628234
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design criteria for electrochemical shock resistant battery electrodes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c2ee21874g
- The paper
- Woodford, W. H., Carter, W. C., & Chiang, Y.-M. (2012). Design criteria for electrochemical shock resistant battery electrodes. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee21874g
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.