The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling, simulation, and design criteria for photoelectrochemical water-splitting systems
Open accessAbstract
A validated multi-physics numerical model that accounts for charge and species conservation, fluid flow, and electrochemical processes has been used to analyze the performance of solar-driven photoelectrochemical water-splitting systems. The modeling has provided an in-depth analysis of conceptual designs, proof-of-concepts, feasibility investigations, and quantification of performance. The modeling has led to the formulation of design guidelines at the system and component levels, and has identified quantifiable gaps that warrant further research effort at the component level. The two characteristic generic types of photoelectrochemical systems that were analyzed utilized: (i) side-by-side photoelectrodes and (ii) back-to-back photoelectrodes. In these designs, small electrode dimensions (mm to cm range) and large electrolyte heights were required to produce small overall resistive losses in the system. Additionally, thick, non-permeable separators were required to achieve acceptably low rates of product crossover.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bruggeman, D. A. G. (1935) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.19354160705 · Cited by 8,645
Photocatalytic Water Splitting: Recent Progress and Future Challenges
Maeda, K., & Domen, K. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/jz1007966 · Cited by 2,739
Comparing Photosynthetic and Photovoltaic Efficiencies and Recognizing the Potential for Improvement
Blankenship, R. E., Tiede, D. M., Barber, J., Brudvig, G. W., Fleming, G., Ghirardi, M., Gunner, M. R., Junge, W., Kramer, D. M., Melis, A., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1200165 · Cited by 1,638
Modeling Transport in Polymer-Electrolyte Fuel Cells
Weber, A. Z., & Newman, J. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020729l · Cited by 738
Self-citation
Cited by
New Insights into Perfluorinated Sulfonic-Acid Ionomers
Kusoglu, A., & Weber, A. Z. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00159 · Cited by 2,432
Self-citationSemiconducting materials for photoelectrochemical energy conversion
Sivula, K., & van de Krol, R. (2016) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2015.10 · Cited by 1,645
Photoelectrochemical water splitting in separate oxygen and hydrogen cells
Landman, A., Dotan, H., Shter, G. E., Wullenkord, M., Houaijia, A., Maljusch, A., Grader, G. S., & Rothschild, A. (2017) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4876 · Cited by 572
Becker, J.-P., Turan, B., Smirnov, V., Welter, K., Urbain, F., Wolff, J., Haas, S., & Finger, F. (2017) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c6ta10688a · Cited by 52
Membraneless laminar flow cell for electrocatalytic CO 2 reduction with liquid product separation
Monroe, M. M., Lobaccaro, P., Lum, Y., & Ager, J. W. (2017) · Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6463/aa6359 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Haussener, S., Xiang, C., Spurgeon, J. M., Ardo, S., Lewis, N. S., & Weber, A. Z.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 9922
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2098811911
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling, simulation, and design criteria for photoelectrochemical water-splitting systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c2ee23187e
- The paper
- Haussener, S., Xiang, C., Spurgeon, J. M., Ardo, S., Lewis, N. S., & Weber, A. Z. (2012). Modeling, simulation, and design criteria for photoelectrochemical water-splitting systems. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee23187e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.