The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development and characterisation of a new bioink for additive tissue manufacturing
Open accessAbstract
Additive manufacturing forms a potential route towards economically viable production of cellular constructs for tissue engineering. Hydrogels are a suitable class of materials for cell delivery and 3D culture, but are generally unsuitable as construction materials. Gelatine-methacrylamide is an example of such a hydrogel system widely used in the field of tissue engineering, e.g. for cartilage and cardiovascular applications. Here we show that by the addition of gellan gum to gelatine-methacrylamide and tailoring salt concentrations, rheological properties such as pseudo-plasticity and yield stress can be optimised towards gel dispensing for additive manufacturing processes. In the hydrogel formulation, salt is partly substituted by mannose to obtain isotonicity and prevent a reduction in cell viability. With this, the potential of this new bioink for additive tissue manufacturing purposes is demonstrated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels
Nichol, J. W., Koshy, S. T., Bae, H., Hwang, C. M., Yamanlar, S., & Khademhosseini, A. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.064 · Cited by 2,377
25th Anniversary Article: Engineering Hydrogels for Biofabrication
Malda, J., Visser, J., Melchels, F. P., Jüngst, T., Hennink, W. E., Dhert, W. J. A., Groll, J., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201302042 · Cited by 1,901
Self-citationBilliet, T., Gevaert, E., De Schryver, T., Cornelissen, M., & Dubruel, P. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078 · Cited by 1,015
Gauvin, R., Chen, Y.-C., Lee, J. W., Soman, P., Zorlutuna, P., Nichol, J. W., Bae, H., Chen, S., & Khademhosseini, A. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.048 · Cited by 641
Cited by
Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels
Yue, K., Trujillo-de Santiago, G., Alvarez, M. M., Tamayol, A., Annabi, N., & Khademhosseini, A. (2015) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.045 · Cited by 3,146
“Other studies also have explored the use of GelMA hydrogels in the bioprinting technique to manufacture cell-laden constructs with high cell viability (between 77 and 97%) for tissue engineering applications [18,62].”
Printability and shape fidelity of bioinks in 3D bioprinting
Schwab, A., Levato, R., D’Este, M., Piluso, S., Eglin, D., & Malda, J. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00084 · Cited by 1,359
Self-citationProgress in 3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ regenerative engineering
Matai, I., Kaur, G., Seyedsalehi, A., McClinton, A., & Laurencin, C. T. (2020) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119536 · Cited by 1,156
Hydrogel Bioink Reinforcement for Additive Manufacturing: A Focused Review of Emerging Strategies
Chimene, D., Kaunas, R., & Gaharwar, A. K. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201902026 · Cited by 600
Processing of collagen based biomaterials and the resulting materials properties
Meyer, M. (2019) · BioMedical Engineering OnLine · doi:10.1186/s12938-019-0647-0 · Cited by 539
Metadata
- Authors
- Melchels, F. P. W., Dhert, W. J. A., Hutmacher, D. W., & Malda, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Materials Chemistry B
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 2282
- ISSN
- 2050-750X (ISSN-L)
- 2050-7518
- OpenAlex
- W2136912970
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and characterisation of a new bioink for additive tissue manufacturing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3tb21280g
- The paper
- Melchels, F. P. W., Dhert, W. J. A., Hutmacher, D. W., & Malda, J. (2014). Development and characterisation of a new bioink for additive tissue manufacturing. Journal of Materials Chemistry B. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3tb21280g
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
