Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 398

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unexpected discovery of low-cost maricite NaFePO4as a high-performance electrode for Na-ion batteries

Open access
Kim, Jongsoon, Seo, Dong-Hwa, Kim, Hyungsub, Park, Inchul, Yoo, Jung-Keun, Jung, Sung-Kyun, Park, Young-Uk, Goddard III, William A., Kang, Kisuk·2015·Energy & Environmental Science

Abstract

Maricite NaFePO 4 can function as an excellent cathode material for Na ion batteries, an unexpected result since it has been regarded as an electrochemically inactive electrode for rechargeable batteries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c4ee03215b

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kim, J., Seo, D.-H., Kim, H., Park, I., Yoo, J.-K., Jung, S.-K., Park, Y.-U., Goddard III, W. A., & Kang, K.
Venue
Energy & Environmental Science
Published
2015
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
540-545
ISSN
  • 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-5706
OpenAlex
W2166360174
Cited by
398
References
32
FWCI
17.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.