Cited by 221Polysaccharides Composition and ApplicationsProbiotics and Fermented FoodsMicrobial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 179 of the 180 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sugar-coated: exopolysaccharide producing lactic acid bacteria for food and human health applications

Abstract

The human enteric microbiome represents a veritable organ relied upon by the host for a range of metabolic and homeostatic functions. Through the production of metabolites such as short chain fatty acids (SCFA), folate, vitamins B and K, lactic acid, bacteriocins, peroxides and exopolysaccharides, the bacteria of the gut microbiome provide nutritional components for colonocytes, liver and muscle cells, competitively exclude potential pathogenic organisms and modulate the hosts immune system. Due to the extensive variation in structure, size and composition, microbial exopolysaccharides represent a useful set of versatile natural ingredients for the food industrial sector, both in terms of their rheological properties and in many cases, their associated health benefits. The exopolysaccharide-producing bacteria that fall within the 35 Lactobacillus and five Bifidobacterium species which have achieved qualified presumption of safety (QPS) and generally recognised as safe (GRAS) status are of particular interest, as their inclusion in food products can avoid considerable scrutiny. In addition, additives commonly utilised by the food industry are becoming unattractive to the consumer, due to the demand for a more 'natural' and 'clean labelled' diet. In situ production of exopolysaccharides by food-grade cultures in many cases confers similar rheological and sensory properties in fermented dairy products, as traditional additives, such as hydrocolloids, collagen and alginate. This review will focus on microbial synthesis of exopolysaccharides, the human health benefits of dietary exopolysaccharides and the technofunctional applications of exopolysaccharide-synthesising microbes in the food industry.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c4fo00529e

Cites

179 of 179 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 180 references

1 of the 180 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Ciszek-Lenda, 2013, Cent. Eur. J. Immunol., 38, 290
  2. Patel, 2010, Food Technol. Biotechnol., 48, 451
  3. Liu, 2011, J. Sci. Food Agric., 91, 2284
  4. Liu, 2011, J. Sci. Food Agric., 91, 2284
  5. Cremer, 2010, Roumanian Biotechnological Letters, 15, 5718
  6. Tok, 2010, Microbiol. Immunol., 54, 257
  7. Bleau, 2010, J. Appl. Microbiol., 108, 666, 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04450.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–221 of 221

Metadata

Authors
Ryan, P. M., Ross, R. P., Fitzgerald, G. F., Caplice, N. M., & Stanton, C.
Affiliations
  • Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE)
  • University College Cork (IE)
  • Center for Vascular Biology Research (US)
Corresponding author
Stanton, C.
Venue
Food & Function
Published
2015
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
679-693
ISSN
  • 2042-6496 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-650X
OpenAlex
W2116183542
Cited by
221
References
180
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food & Function (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Science Foundation Ireland (07/CE/B1368)
  • European Commission (289517)
  • Teagasc
  • Enterprise Ireland (CF/2013/3030A/B)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
Keywords
exopolysaccharides, lactic acid bacteria, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, gut microbiota, short-chain fatty acids, fermented dairy products, rheological properties, functional food additives, clean label, human health benefits
MeSH terms
Bifidobacterium, Dietary Carbohydrates, Fermentation, Humans, Lactobacillus, Models, Biological, Nutritive Value, Polysaccharides, Bacterial, Surface Properties, Foods, Specialized, Cultured Milk Products, Chemical Phenomena, Lactobacillales, Immunomodulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review