Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 337

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An overview of the suitability of hydrogel-forming polymers for extrusion-based 3D-printing

Kirchmajer, D. M., Gorkin III, R., in het Panhuis, M.·2015·Journal of Materials Chemistry B

Abstract

In this review hydrogel-forming polymers that are suitable for extrusion-based 3D printing are evaluated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c5tb00393h

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 337

Metadata

Authors
Kirchmajer, D. M., Gorkin III, R., & in het Panhuis, M.
Venue
Journal of Materials Chemistry B
Published
2015
Volume
3
Issue
20
Pages
4105-4117
ISSN
  • 2050-750X (ISSN-L)
  • 2050-7518
OpenAlex
W2169219967
Cited by
337
References
9
FWCI
13.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An overview of the suitability of hydrogel-forming polymers for extrusion-based 3D-printing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c5tb00393h
The paper
Kirchmajer, D. M., Gorkin III, R., & in het Panhuis, M. (2015). An overview of the suitability of hydrogel-forming polymers for extrusion-based 3D-printing. Journal of Materials Chemistry B. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5tb00393h

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.