Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,098

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 298 of the 298 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reactive oxygen species generating systems meeting challenges of photodynamic cancer therapy

Open access
Zhou, Zijian, Song, Jibin, Nie, Liming, Chen, Xiaoyuan·2016·Chemical Society Reviews

Abstract

Summary of advanced strategies to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) through both photodynamic and non-photodynamic procedures for cancer therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c6cs00271d

Cites

298 of 298 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Items 201–298 of 298

Cited by

See all 2,098

Metadata

Authors
Zhou, Z., Song, J., Nie, L., & Chen, X.
Venue
Chemical Society Reviews
Published
2016
Volume
45
Issue
23
Pages
6597-6626
ISSN
  • 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4744
OpenAlex
W2529562623
Cited by
2,098
References
298
FWCI
30.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.