CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 379Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionHydrogen Storage and MaterialsHydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals

Nickel phosphide: the effect of phosphorus content on hydrogen evolution activity and corrosion resistance in acidic medium

Open access
Kucernak, Anthony R. J., Naranammalpuram Sundaram, Venkata N.·2014·J. Mater. Chem. A
DOI 10.1039/c4ta03468f
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The activity and stability of nickel phosphides including electrodeposited nickel phosphide, Ni 12 P 5 and Ni 2 P are tested. Under acid conditions activity and stability improves with phosphorus content. Surface treatment of Ni 2 P is shown to lead to further activity improvements.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c4ta03468f

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • P atoms can be oxidized to less soluble phosphate on the catalyst surface, which protects TMPs from dissolution and improves HER stability.

    “Moreover, the P atoms could be oxidized to the”

    From Phosphorus doped nickel-molybdenum aerogel for efficient overall water splitting (2021) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says phosphorus may oxidize to relatively insoluble phosphate and lists this as a contributor to phosphides’ corrosion resistance. The Electrochemistry of nickel phosphide electrodes section (page unavailable) distinguishes corrosion at oxidizing potentials from operation under the reducing potentials used for HER. The paper does not establish that a phosphate layer forms on catalyst surfaces during HER or that such a layer improves HER stability. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • The superior electrochemical stability of Ni-Mo-P originates from less soluble phosphate formed on the surface of Ni-Mo, which inhibits dissolution of Ni-Mo during electrochemical measurement.

    “These results suggested the superior”

    From Phosphorus doped nickel-molybdenum aerogel for efficient overall water splitting (2021) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Introduction says phosphorus can oxidize to relatively insoluble phosphate and describes this as one contributor to the corrosion resistance of nickel-phosphorus materials. The paper does not establish that a phosphate layer forms on Ni-Mo-P or that it inhibits dissolution of Ni-Mo during electrochemical measurement; its experiments concern nickel phosphides and Ni-P alloy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. M. Höök and X. Tang, Energy Policy, 2013, 52, 797-809.
  2. M. S. Dresselhaus and I. L. Thomas, Nature, 2001, 414, 332- 337.
  3. Y. Choquette, H. Menard and L. Brossard, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 1990, 15, 21-26.
  4. S. Marini, P. Salvi, P. Nelli, R. Pesenti, M. Villa, M. Berrettoni, G. Zangari and Y. Kiros, Electrochim. Acta, 2012, 82, 384-391.
  5. S. Dunn, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2002, 27, 235-264.
  6. M. Carmo, D. L. Fritz, J. Mergel and D. Stolten, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38, 4901-4934.
  7. S. A. Grigoriev, P. Millet and V. N. Fateev, J. Power Sources, 2008, 177, 281-285.
  8. A. Döner, F. Tezcan and G. Kardas ¸, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38, 3881-3888.
  9. S. Ardizzone, G. Fregonara and S. Trasatti, Electrochim. Acta, 1990, 35, 263-267.
  10. I. Kodintsev and S. Trasatti, Electrochim. Acta, 1994, 39, 1803-1808.
  11. J. Divisek, H. Schmitz and B. Steffen, Electrochim. Acta, 1994, 39, 1723-1731.
  12. B. E. Conway and G. Jerkiewicz, Electrochim. Acta, 2000, 45, 4075-4083.
  13. H. Ezaki, M. Morinaga and S. Watanabe, Electrochim. Acta, 1993, 38, 557-564.
  14. J. G. Higheld, E. Claude and K. Oguro, Electrochim. Acta, 1999, 44, 2805-2814.
  15. C. Hitz and A. Lasia, J. Electroanal. Chem., 2001, 500, 213- 222.
  16. W. Hu, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2000, 25, 111-118.
  17. M. Metikoš-Huković and A. Jukić, Electrochim. Acta, 2000, 45, 4159-4170.
  18. S. Trasatti, J. Electroanal. Chem., 1972, 39, 163-184.
  19. E. Navarro-Flores, Z. Chong and S. Omanovic, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2005, 226, 179-197.
  20. R. Karimishervedani and A. Rezamadram, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33, 2468-2476.
  21. C. C. Hu and A. Bai, J. Appl. Electrochem., 2001, 31, 565-572.
  22. T. Burchardt, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2000, 25, 627-634.
  23. L. Vračar and B. E. Conway, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 1990, 15, 701-713.
  24. A.-M. Alexander and J. S. J. Hargreaves, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 4388.
  25. B. M. Barry and E. G. Gillan, Chem. Mater., 2008, 20, 2618- 2620.
  26. A. E. Henkes, Y. Vasquez and R. E. Schaak, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 1896-1897.
  27. M. V. Gerasimov and Y. N. Simirskii, Metallurgist, 2008, 52, 477-481.
  28. E. J. Popczun, J. R. McKone, C. G. Read, A. J. Biacchi, A. M. Wiltrout, N. S. Lewis and R. E. Schaak, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 9267-9270.
  29. M. Popczyk, A. Budniok and A. Lasia, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2005, 30, 265-271.
  30. Y. You, C. Gu, X. Wang and J. Tu, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2012, 159, D642-D648.
  31. M. Palaniappa, G. V. Babu and K. Balasubramanian, Mater. Sci. Eng., 2007, 471, 165-168.
  32. R. K. Shervedani and A. Lasia, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1997, 144, 2652-2657.
  33. P. Xiao, M. A. Sk, L. Thia, X. Ge, R. J. Lim, J.-Y. Wang, K. H. Lim and X. Wang, Energy Environ. Sci., 2014, 7, 2624- 2629.
  34. E. J. Popczun, C. G. Read, C. W. Roske, N. S. Lewis and R. E. Schaak, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 5427-5430.
  35. J. D. Benck, Z. B. Chen, L. Y. Kuritzky, A. J. Forman and T. F. Jaramillo, ACS Catal., 2012, 2, 1916-1923.
  36. T. F. Jaramillo, K. P. Jorgensen, J. Bonde, J. H. Nielsen, S. Horch and I. Chorkendorff, Science, 2007, 317, 100-102.
  37. Y. Ni, K. Liao and J. Li, CrystEngComm, 2010, 12, 1568.
  38. K. S. Venkataraman and K. S. Narayanan, Powder Technol., 1998, 96, 190-201.
  39. J. L. Carbajal and R. E. White, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1988, 135, 2952-2957.
  40. B. Elsener, D. Atzei, A. Krolikowski, V. Rossi Albertini, C. Sadun, R. Caminiti and A. Rossi, Chem. Mater., 2004, 16, 4216-4225.
  41. B. Elsener, M. Crobu, M. A. Scorciapino and A. Rossi, J. Appl. Electrochem., 2008, 38, 1053-1060.
  42. B. Losiewicz, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2004, 29, 145-157.
  43. A. Krolikowski and A. Wiecko, Electrochim. Acta, 2002, 47, 2065-2069.
  44. C. Hausleitner and J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 1993, 47, 5689-5709.
  45. M. Kramer and M. Tomkiewicz, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1984, 131, 1283-1288.
  46. S. Omanovic and S. G. Roscoe, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2000, 227, 452-460.
  47. O. Savadogo and E. Ndzebet, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2001, 26, 213-218.
  48. R. Simpraga, G. Tremiliosi, S. Y. Qian and B. E. Conway, J. Electroanal. Chem., 1997, 424, 141-151.
  49. B. Børresen, G. Hagen and R. Tunold, Electrochim. Acta, 2002, 47, 1819-1827.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Kucernak, A. R. J., & Naranammalpuram Sundaram, V. N.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Department of Chemistry
Corresponding author
Kucernak, Anthony R. J.
ORCID
Kucernak, Anthony R. J.
Venue
J. Mater. Chem. A
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Published
2014
Volume
2
Issue
41
Pages
17435-17445
ISSN
  • 2050-7488 (ISSN-L)
  • 2050-7496
DOI
10.1039/c4ta03468f
OpenAlex
W2094524328
Cited by
379
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 1
FWCI
9.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Materials Chemistry A (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/I013032/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Hydrogen Storage and Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Metals and Alloys › Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
Keywords
nickel phosphide, hydrogen evolution reaction, phosphorus content, corrosion resistance, acidic media, Ni12P5, catalyst stability, surface treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review