Cited by 150RNA Interference and Gene DeliveryCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringGraphene and Nanomaterials Applications

Graphene oxide-mediated Cas9/sgRNA delivery for efficient genome editing

Yue, Huahua, Zhou, Xiaoming, Cheng, Meng, Xing, Da·2018·Nanoscale

Abstract

Direct cellular delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 complexes is of great significance for genome editing and other recently developed applications, such as gene expression regulation and RNA/DNA imaging. Here, we first constructed a graphene oxide (GO)-polyethylene glycol (PEG)-polyethylenimine (PEI) nanocarrier for the delivery of high-molecular-weight Cas9/single-guide RNA (sgRNA) complexes for endocytosis, endosomal escape, nuclear entry, and gene editing. The results demonstrate that the nanocarrier can be used successfully for efficient gene editing in human AGS cells with an efficiency of ∼39%. The results also show that this nanocarrier can protect sgRNA from enzymatic degradation, thus exhibiting extremely high stability, which is critical for future in vivo applications. Thus, this GO-mediated Cas9/sgRNA delivery system has potential as a new approach for biomedical research and targeted gene engineering applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c7nr07999k

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Zeolitic imidazole frameworks and graphene oxide-PEG-polyethylenimine have been investigated to facilitate endosomal evasion.

    “Some materials, such as zeolitic imidazole frameworks (ZIFs) [229] and graphene oxide (GO)-PEG-polyethylenimine (PEI) [230] have been investigated to facilitate endosomal evasion.”
  • Graphene oxide-poly(ethylene glycol)-polyethylenimine (GO-PEG-PEI) nanocarrier induced efficient genome editing in AGS cells with an efficiency of ~39%.

    “In a recent study, graphene oxide-poly(ethylene glycol)-polyethylenimine (GO-PEG-PEI) nanocarrier mediated efficient CRISPR RNPs delivery via physisorption and π-stacking interaction. This strategy induced efficient genome editing in AGS cells with an efficiency of ~39% (Fig. 2D) [102].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Yue, H., Zhou, X., Cheng, M., & Xing, D.
Affiliations
South China Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhou, Xiaoming
  • Xing, Da
Venue
Nanoscale
Published
2018
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
1063-1071
ISSN
  • 2040-3364 (ISSN-L)
  • 2040-3372
OpenAlex
W2778181726
Cited by
150
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 13 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nanoscale (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (21475048)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
Keywords
graphene oxide, CRISPR/Cas9 delivery, single guide RNA, polyethylene glycol, polyethyleneimine, nanocarriers, genome editing, endosomal escape, nuclear entry, AGS cells
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, RNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Cell Line, Graphite, Humans, Oxides, RNA, Guide, Kinetoplastida, Green Fluorescent Proteins, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review