Cited by 49Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and InhibitionCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsCrystallization and Solubility Studies

Anomalously low activation energy of nanoconfined MgCO 3 precipitation

Open access
Miller, Quin R. S., Kaszuba, John P., Schaef, Herbert T., Bowden, Mark E., McGrail, B. Peter, Rosso, Kevin M.·2019·Chemical Communications

Abstract

Experimental study of nanoconfined MgCO 3 nucleation and growth processes reveals elevated kinetics due to less strongly hydrated Mg 2+ .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c9cc01337g

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Forsterite-to-magnesite carbonation has apparent activation energies of 34±7 kJ/mol at 100% RH and 83±17 kJ/mol at 85% RH.

    “Miller et al. 46,137 measured time-dependent forsterite to magnesite carbonation at different temperatures, and determined apparent activation energies of 34±7 kJ/mol at 100% RH and 83±17 kJ/mol at 85% RH, Figure 7.”

    From Molecular-scale mechanisms of CO2 mineralization in nanoscale interfacial water films (2022) · cites this paper as [46]

    The results section reports an apparent activation energy of 36±6 kJ/mol for magnesite precipitation in ~1 nm water films from 50–90 °C, using forsterite reacted with water-saturated CO₂. That supports the general measurement described, but not the quoted 34±7 kJ/mol value; our copy also does not report an 85% RH measurement or 83±17 kJ/mol. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. [1]1. B. P. McGrail, H. T. Schaef, F. A. Spane, J. B. Cliff, O. Qafoku, J. A. Horner, C. J. Thompson, A. T. Owen and C. E. Sullivan, Environ. Sci. & Technol. Lett., 2017, 4, 6-10.
  2. [2]2. J. M. Matter, M. Stute, S. O. Snaebjornsdottir, E. H. Oelkers, S. R. Gislason, E. S. Aradottir, B. Sigfusson, I. Gunnarsson, H. Sigurdardottir, E. Gunnlaugsson, G. Axelsson, H. A. Alfredsson, D. Wolff-Boenisch, K. Mesfin, D. F. de la Reguera Taya, J. Hall, K. Dideriksen and W. S. Broecker, Science, 2016, 352, 1312-1314.
  3. [3]3. A. J. Luhmann, B. M. Tutolo, B. C. Bagley, D. F. R. Mildner, W. E. Seyfried and M. O. Saar, Water Resour. Res., 2017, 53, 1908-1927.
  4. [4]4. I. C. Bourg, L. E. Beckingham and D. J. DePaolo, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2015, 49, 10265-10284.
  5. [5]5. K. M. Mouzakis, A. K. Navarre-Sitchler, G. Rother, J. L. Bañuelos, X. Wang, J. P. Kaszuba, J. E. Heath, Q. R. S. Miller, V. Alvarado and J. E. McCray, Environ. Eng. Sci., 2016, 33, 725-735.
  6. [6]6. J. Zachara, S. Brantley, J. Chorover, R. Ewing, S. Kerisit, C. X. Liu, E. Perfect, G. Rother and A. G. Stack, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2016, 50, 2811-2829.
  7. [8]8. S. A. Miners, G. A. Rance and A. N. Khlobystov, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2016, 45, 4727-4746.
  8. [9]9. C. Zhang, W. Zhu, S. Li, G. Wu, X. Ma, X. Wang and J. Gong, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 9383-9385.
  9. [10]10. V. Augustyn and Y. Gogotsi, Joule, 2017, 1, 443-452.
  10. [11]11. T. Yu, Q. Li, X. Zhao, H. Xia, L. Ma, J. Wang, Y. S. Meng and X. Shen, ACS Energy Lett., 2017, 2, 2341-2348.
  11. [12]12. J. Sun, D. Li, Y. Xia, X. Zhu, L. Zong, Q. Ji, Y. A. Jia and D. Yang, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 16267-16270.
  12. [14]14. Q. R. S. Miller, H. T. Schaef, J. P. Kaszuba, L. Qiu, M. E. Bowden and B. P. McGrail, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2018, 52, 7138-7148.
  13. [15]15. Q. R. S. Miller, J. P. Kaszuba, H. T. Schaef, M. E. Bowden and B. P. McGrail, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2015, 49, 4724-4734.
  14. [16]16. J. S. Loring, Q. R. S. Miller, H. T. Schaef and C. J. Thompson, in Science of Carbon Storage in Deep Saline Formations: Process Coupling across Time and Spatial Scales, eds. P. Newell and A. G. Ilgen, Elsevier, 1st edn., 2018.
  15. [17]17. M. Pavlov, P. E. Siegbahn and M. Sandström, J. Phys. Chem. A, 1998, 102, 219-228.
  16. [19]19. I. M. Power, P. A. Kenward, G. M. Dipple and M. Raudsepp, Cryst. Growth Des., 2017, 17, 5652-5659.
  17. [20]20. A. R. Felmy, O. Qafoku, B. W. Arey, J. Z. Hu, M. Hu, H. T. Schaef, E. S. Ilton, N. J. Hess, C. I. Pearce, J. Feng and K. M. Rosso, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 2012, 91, 271-282.
  18. [22]22. Q. R. S. Miller, E. S. Ilton, O. Qafoku, D. A. Dixon, M. Vasiliu, C. J. Thompson, H. T. Schaef, K. M. Rosso and J. S. Loring, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2018, 9, 4988-4994.
  19. [23]23. Q. R. S. Miller, C. J. Thompson, J. S. Loring, C. F. Windisch, M. E. Bowden, D. W. Hoyt, J. Z. Hu, B. W. Arey, K. M. Rosso and H. T. Schaef, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 2013, 15, 104-118.
  20. [24]24. H. T. Schaef, B. P. McGrail, J. L. Loring, M. E. Bowden, B. W. Arey and K. M. Rosso, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2013, 47, 174-181.
  21. [25]25. L. Fumagalli, A. Esfandiar, R. Fabregas, S. Hu, P. Ares, A. Janardanan, Q. Yang, B. Radha, T. Taniguchi and K. Watanabe, Science, 2018, 360, 1339-1342.
  22. [26]26. Y. F. Wang, C. Bryan, H. F. Xu and H. Z. Gao, Geology, 2003, 31, 387-390.
  23. [27]27. S. Senapati and A. Chandra, J. Phys. Chem. B., 2001, 105, 5106- 5109.
  24. [28]28. R. K. Kalluri, D. Konatham and A. Striolo, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115, 13786-13795.
  25. [29]29. J. Nelson, J. R. Bargar, L. Wasylenki, G. E. Brown and K. Maher, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 2018, 240, 80-97.
  26. [30]30. Y. Diao and R. M. Espinosa-Marzal, PNAS, 2016, 113, 12047- 12052.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, Q. R. S., Kaszuba, J. P., Schaef, H. T., Bowden, M. E., McGrail, B. P., & Rosso, K. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Wyoming (US)
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, Quin R. S.
Venue
Chemical Communications
Published
2019
Volume
55
Issue
48
Pages
6835-6837
ISSN
  • 1359-7345 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-548X
OpenAlex
W2947843928
Cited by
49
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemical Communications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Basic Energy Sciences
  • Office of Fossil Energy
  • University of Wyoming
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Crystallization and Solubility Studies
Keywords
magnesite precipitation, magnesium carbonate, nanoconfinement, activation energy, adsorbed water films, hydration structure, mineral nucleation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review