The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bioinformatic and experimental survey of 14-3-3-binding sites
Open accessAbstract
More than 200 phosphorylated 14-3-3-binding sites in the literature were analysed to define 14-3-3 specificities, identify relevant protein kinases, and give insights into how cellular 14-3-3/phosphoprotein networks work. Mode I RXX(pS/pT)XP motifs dominate, although the +2 proline residue occurs in less than half, and LX(R/K)SX(pS/pT)XP is prominent in plant 14-3-3-binding sites. Proline at +1 is rarely reported, and such motifs did not stand up to experimental reanalysis of human Ndel1. Instead, we discovered that 14-3-3 interacts with two residues that are phosphorylated by basophilic kinases and located in the DISC1 (disrupted-in-schizophrenia 1)-interacting region of Ndel1 that is implicated in cognitive disorders. These data conform with the general findings that there are different subtypes of 14-3-3-binding sites that overlap with the specificities of different basophilic AGC (protein kinase A/protein kinase G/protein kinase C family) and CaMK (Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase) protein kinases, and a 14-3-3 dimer often engages with two tandem phosphorylated sites, which is a configuration with special signalling, mechanical and evolutionary properties. Thus 14-3-3 dimers can be digital logic gates that integrate more than one input to generate an action, and coincidence detectors when the two binding sites are phosphorylated by different protein kinases. Paired sites are generally located within disordered regions and/or straddle either side of functional domains, indicating how 14-3-3 dimers modulate the conformations and/or interactions of their targets. Finally, 14-3-3 proteins bind to members of several multi-protein families. Two 14-3-3-binding sites are conserved across the class IIa histone deacetylases, whereas other protein families display differential regulation by 14-3-3s. We speculate that 14-3-3 dimers may have contributed to the evolution of such families, tailoring regulatory inputs to different physiological demands.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WebLogo: A Sequence Logo Generator: Figure 1
Crooks, G. E., Hon, G., Chandonia, J.-M., & Brenner, S. E. (2004) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.849004 · Cited by 12,386
The protein kinase complement of the human genome
Manning, G., Whyte, D. B., Martinez, R., Hunter, T., & Sudarsanam, S. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1075762 · Cited by 8,145
Sequence logos: a new way to display consensus sequences
Schneider, T. D., & Stephens, R. M. (1990) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/18.20.6097 · Cited by 3,378
Zhao, B., Wei, X., Li, W., Udan, R. S., Yang, Q., Kim, J., Xie, J., Ikenoue, T., Yu, J., Li, L., et al. (2007) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1602907 · Cited by 3,092
Elucidation of a universal size-control mechanism in Drosophila and mammals
Dong, J., Feldmann, G., Huang, J., Wu, S., Zhang, N., Comerford, S. A., Gayyed, M. F., Anders, R. A., Maitra, A., & Pan, D. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.019 · Cited by 2,370
The Structural Basis for 14-3-3:Phosphopeptide Binding Specificity
Yaffe, M. B., Rittinger, K., Volinia, S., Caron, P. R., Aitken, A., Leffers, H., Gamblin, S. J., Smerdon, S. J., & Cantley, L. C. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80487-0 · Cited by 1,604
Scansite 2.0: proteome-wide prediction of cell signaling interactions using short sequence motifs
Obenauer, J. C. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkg584 · Cited by 1,596
Mechanisms of specificity in protein phosphorylation
Ubersax, J. A., & Ferrell Jr, J. E. (2007) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2203 · Cited by 1,451
Interaction of 14-3-3 with Signaling Proteins Is Mediated by the Recognition of Phosphoserine
Muslin, A. J., Tanner, J. W., Allen, P. M., & Shaw, A. S. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81067-3 · Cited by 1,381
Basu, S., Totty, N. F., Irwin, M. S., Sudol, M., & Downward, J. (2003) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00776-1 · Cited by 843
Cited by
Modulators of Protein–Protein Interactions
Milroy, L.-G., Grossmann, T. N., Hennig, S., Brunsveld, L., & Ottmann, C. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400698c · Cited by 497
Signalling by insulin and IGF receptors: supporting acts and new players
Siddle, K. (2011) · Journal of Molecular Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/jme-11-0022 · Cited by 456
Lifespan extension induced by AMPK and calcineurin is mediated by CRTC-1 and CREB
Mair, W., Morantte, I., Rodrigues, A. P. C., Manning, G., Montminy, M., Shaw, R. J., & Dillin, A. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09706 · Cited by 393
mTORC1 Promotes Metabolic Reprogramming by the Suppression of GSK3-dependent Foxk1 Phosphorylation
He, L., Gomes, A. P., Wang, X., Yoon, S. O., Lee, G., Nagiec, M. J., Cho, S., Chavez, A., Islam, T., Yu, Y., et al. (2018) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.04.024 · Cited by 145
Anders, C., Higuchi, Y., Koschinsky, K., Bartel, M., Schumacher, B., Thiel, P., Nitta, H., Preisig-Müller, R., Schlichthörl, G., Renigunta, V., et al. (2013) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.03.015 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, C., Crowther, S., Stafford, M. J., Campbell, D. G., Toth, R., & MacKintosh, C.
- Venue
- Biochemical Journal
- Publisher
- Portland Press Ltd.
- Published
- 2010-03-15
- Volume
- 427
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 69-78
- ISSN
- 0264-6021 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-8728
- OpenAlex
- W2162404348
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 84
- FWCI
- 9.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bioinformatic and experimental survey of 14-3-3-binding sites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1042/bj20091834
- The paper
- Johnson, C., Crowther, S., Stafford, M. J., Campbell, D. G., Toth, R., & MacKintosh, C. (2010). Bioinformatic and experimental survey of 14-3-3-binding sites. Biochemical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj20091834
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.