Cited by 81Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismLanguage Development and DisordersReading and Literacy Development

Acquisition and Generalization Responses in Aphasia Naming Treatment: A Meta-Analysis of Semantic Feature Analysis Outcomes

Quique, Yina M., Evans, William S., Dickey, Michael Walsh·2019·American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

Abstract

Purpose: This meta-analysis synthesizes results from published studies that used semantic feature analysis (SFA) treatment to improve naming for people with aphasia. It examines how both person- and treatment-related variables affected the likelihood of correct naming responses in individual probe sessions for both acquisition (treated) and generalization (untreated) stimuli. Method: The meta-analysis compiled data from 12 studies analyzing a total of 35 participants with aphasia. It used mixed-effects models as a novel statistical tool to examine the effects of 2 sets of variables on naming performance: treatment-related variables, including treatment phase (baseline vs. treatment), dosage (number of treatment sessions), and stimulus type (treated vs. untreated, semantically related vs. unrelated items), and person-specific variables, including degree of language impairment and demographic variables (age, time poststroke). Results: Results of the meta-analysis revealed that SFA intervention promoted increased naming accuracy during naming probes when comparing baseline and treatment phases. In addition, increased dosages of SFA were associated with increased naming accuracy, and treatment-related gains were larger for acquisition (treated) than generalization (untreated) stimuli, likewise for related versus unrelated generalization stimuli. Furthermore, a subset of person-specific variables was predictive of SFA-related gains: Language impairment variables were related to treatment-related changes in naming performance, but demographic variables were not. Conclusion: These results provide group-level evidence for the efficacy of SFA as well as preliminary estimates of how much naming performance benefit is engendered by varying dosages of SFA. The results also provide promising and previously unobserved evidence of potential person-level predictors of SFA treatment response.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1044/2018_ajslp-17-0155

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aphasia severity influences inter-individual variability in treated language improvement in post-stroke aphasia.

    “It is well established that inter-individual variability in TLI in post-stroke aphasia is influenced by an array of factors, including, but not limited to, age12–15, education16–19, aphasia severity11,14,15,20,21, baseline cognitive abilities13,22,23, and, specific to bPWA, bilingual language experience and language of treatment (e.g., whether therapy is delivered in L1 or L2)24,25.”
  • Various approaches, including cognitive-based, cognate-based, and semantic-feature-based treatments, have shown efficacy in producing treated language improvement.

    “Various approaches, including cognitive-based4, cognate-based4,5, and semantic-featured-based treatments (SFT)6–11 have shown efficacy in producing treated language improvement (TLI).”
  • Some studies have shown improvements in naming in the untreated language (cross-language generalization) after treatment.

    “Some studies have further shown improvements in naming in the untreated language (hereafter cross-language generalization; CLG)8–11.”
  • In semantic feature therapy (SFT), greater language system integrity may facilitate the spread of activation to related semantic nodes, promoting generalization to untreated items and cross-language transfer.

    “In SFT, greater language system integrity may facilitate the spread of activation to related semantic nodes, promoting generalization to untreated items and cross-language transfer7,11.”
  • In individuals with milder aphasia, the language system is more preserved and responsive, providing the necessary resources to support the re-learning of previously acquired but inconsistently accessible word forms and the re-establishment of connections between disrupted and available representations.

    “Expanding on the role of aphasia severity and TLI, a meta-analysis of SFT in monolingual aphasia proposed that in individuals with milder aphasia, the language system is more preserved and responsive, providing the necessary resources to support the re-learning of previously acquired but inconsistently accessible word forms and the re-establishment of connections between disrupted and available”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quique, Y. M., Evans, W. S., & Dickey, M. W.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Published
2019-03-11
Volume
28
Issue
1S
Pages
230-246
ISSN
  • 1058-0360 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-9110
OpenAlex
W2890701693
Cited by
81
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 RX000832)
  • Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center
  • VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
aphasia, semantic feature analysis, word naming, treatment generalization, treatment dosage, stroke, language impairment
MeSH terms
Aphasia, Generalization, Psychological, Humans, Language Tests, Language Therapy, Semantics, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review