The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multicenter screening for pre‐eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by transvaginal uterine artery Doppler at 23 weeks of gestation
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To determine the value of transvaginal color Doppler assessment of the uterine arteries at 23 weeks of gestation in predicting the subsequent development of pre‐eclampsia and fetal growth restriction. Patients and methods: Women with singleton pregnancies attending for routine ultrasound examination at 23 weeks in any one of seven hospitals underwent Doppler assessment of the uterine arteries. The presence of an early diastolic notch in the waveform was noted, and the mean pulsatility index of the two arteries was calculated. Screening characteristics in the prediction of pre‐eclampsia and the delivery of a low birth‐weight infant were calculated. Results: Doppler examination of the uterine arteries was attempted in 8335 consecutive singleton pregnancies, satisfactory waveforms were obtained from both vessels in 8202 (98.4%) cases and complete outcome data were available in 7851 (95.7%) of these. The mean gestational age was 23 (range, 22–24) weeks. The mean uterine artery pulsatility index did not change significantly with gestation (r = –0.0078; P = 0.483); the median value was 1.04 and the 95th centile was 1.63. In 9.3% of cases early diastolic notches in the waveform from both uterine arteries were present and in an additional 11.1% of cases there were notches unilaterally. Pre‐eclampsia with fetal growth restriction occurred in 42 (0.5%) cases, pre‐eclampsia without fetal growth restriction in 71 (0.9%) and fetal growth restriction without pre‐eclampsia in 698 (8.9%). The sensitivity of increased pulsatility index above the 95th centile (1.63) for pre‐eclampsia with fetal growth restriction was 69%, for pre‐eclampsia without fetal growth restriction was 24%, for fetal growth restriction without pre‐eclampsia was 13%, for pre‐eclampsia irrespective of fetal growth restriction was 41% and for fetal growth restriction irrespective of pre‐eclampsia was 16%. The sensitivity of fetal growth restriction defined by the 5th rather than the 10th centile was higher (19% vs. 16%). The sensitivity for both pre‐eclampsia and fetal growth restriction was inversely related to the gestational age at delivery; when delivery occurred before 32 weeks, the sensitivity for all cases of pre‐eclampsia with fetal growth restriction, pre‐eclampsia without fetal growth restriction and fetal growth restriction without pre‐eclampsia increased to 93%, 80% and 56%, respectively. The sensitivity of bilateral notches in predicting pre‐eclampsia and/or fetal growth restriction was similar to that of increased pulsatility index but the screen‐positive rate with notches (9.3%) was much higher than that with increased pulsatility index (5.1%). Conclusions: A one‐stage color Doppler screening program at 23 weeks identifies most women who subsequently develop severe pre‐eclampsia and/or fetal growth restriction. Copyright © 2001 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
KHONG, T. Y., DE WOLF, F., ROBERTSON, W. B., & BROSENS, I. (1986) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07830.x · Cited by 1,591
The classification and definition of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
Davey, D. A., & MacGillivray, I. (1988) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(88)90090-7 · Cited by 1,288
The physiological response of the vessels of the placental bed to normal pregnancy
Brosens, I., Robertson, W. B., & Dixon, H. G. (1967) · The Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology · doi:10.1002/path.1700930218 · Cited by 788
Pijnenborg, R., Bland, J. M., Robertson, W. B., & Brosens, I. (1983) · Placenta · doi:10.1016/s0143-4004(83)80043-5 · Cited by 735
NEW DOPPLER TECHNIQUE FOR ASSESSING UTEROPLACENTAL BLOOD FLOW
Campbell, S., Griffin, D. R., Pearce, J. M., Diaz-Recasens, J., Cohen-Overbeek, T. E., Willson, K., & Teague, M. J. (1983) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(83)91970-0 · Cited by 574
Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery
Heath, V. C. F., Southall, T. R., Souka, A. P., Elisseou, A., & Nicolaides, K. H. (1998) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12050312.x · Cited by 542
Self-citationNew birthweight and head circumference centiles for gestational ages 24 to 42 weeks
Yudkin, P. L., Aboualfa, M., Eyre, J. A., Redman, C. W. G., & Wilkinson, A. R. (1987) · Early Human Development · doi:10.1016/0378-3782(87)90099-5 · Cited by 441
Qualitative assessment of uteroplacental blood flow: early screening test for high-risk pregnancies.
Campbell, S. C., Pearce, J. M., Hackett, G. A., Cohen‐Overbeek, T. E., & Hernandez, C. (1986) · PubMed · Cited by 352
Harrington, K., Cooper, D., Lees, C., Hecher, K., & Campbell, S. (1996) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.07030182.x · Cited by 352
Albaiges, G. (2000) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00946-7 · Cited by 344
Cited by
Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia
(2020) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000003891 · Cited by 2,949
Intrauterine growth restriction
Resnik, R. (2002) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01780-x · Cited by 1,022
Romero, R., Nien, J. K., Espinoza, J., Todem, D., Fu, W., Chung, H., Kusanovic, J. P., Gotsch, F., Erez, O., Mazaki-Tovi, S., et al. (2008) · The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.1080/14767050701830480 · Cited by 675
Preeclampsia: Updates in Pathogenesis, Definitions, and Guidelines
Phipps, E., Prasanna, D., Brima, W., & Jim, B. (2016) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.12081115 · Cited by 622
Reference ranges for uterine artery mean pulsatility index at 11–41 weeks of gestation
Gómez, O., Figueras, F., Fernández, S., Bennasar, M., Martínez, J. M., Puerto, B., & Gratacós, E. (2008) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.5315 · Cited by 592
Metadata
- Authors
- Papageorghiou, A. T., Yu, C. K. H., Bindra, R., Pandis, G., & Nicolaides, K. H.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 441-449
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W2162156431
- Cited by
- 537
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 23.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multicenter screening for pre‐eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by transvaginal uterine artery Doppler at 23 weeks of gestation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00572.x
- The paper
- Papageorghiou, A. T., Yu, C. K. H., Bindra, R., Pandis, G., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2001). Multicenter screening for pre‐eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by transvaginal uterine artery Doppler at 23 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00572.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.