The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding polydrug use: review of heroin and cocaine co‐use
Abstract
The use of cocaine by heroin‐dependent individuals, or by patients in methadone or buprenorphine maintenance treatment, is substantial and has negative consequences on health, social adjustment and outcome of opioid‐addiction treatment. The pharmacological reasons for cocaine use in opioid‐dependent individuals, however, are poorly understood and little is known about the patterns of heroin and cocaine co‐use. We reviewed anecdotal evidence suggesting that cocaine is co‐used with opioid drugs in a variety of different patterns, to achieve different goals. Clinical and preclinical experimental evidence indicates that the simultaneous administration of cocaine and heroin (i.e. ‘speedball’) does not induce a novel set of subjective effects, nor is it more reinforcing than either drug alone, especially when the doses of heroin and cocaine are high. There is mixed evidence that the subjective effects of cocaine are enhanced in individuals dependent on opioids, although it is clear that cocaine can alleviate the severity of symptoms of withdrawal from opioids. We also reviewed preclinical studies investigating possible neurobiological interactions between opioids and cocaine, but the results of these studies have been difficult to interpret mainly because the neurochemical mechanisms mediating the motivational effects of cocaine are modified by dependence on, and withdrawal from, opioid drugs. Our analysis encourages further systematic investigation of cocaine use patterns among opioid‐dependent individuals and in laboratory animals. Once clearly identified, pharmacological and neuroanatomical methods can be employed in self‐administering laboratory animals to uncover the neurobiological correlates of specific patterns of co‐use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The neural basis of drug craving: An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction
Robinson, T. (1993) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/0165-0173(93)90013-p · Cited by 7,346
Di Chiara, G., & Imperato, A. (1988) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.85.14.5274 · Cited by 4,733
Drug abuse: hedonic homeostatic dysregulation
Koob, G. F., & Moal, M. L. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.278.5335.52 · Cited by 2,535
Cellular and molecular mechanisms of drug dependence
Koob, G. F., & Bloom, F. E. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2903550 · Cited by 2,070
The psychology and neurobiology of addiction: an incentive–sensitization view
Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2000) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.95.8s2.19.x · Cited by 1,507
Volkow, N. D., Fowler, J. S., Wang, G., Hitzemann, R., Logan, J., Schlyer, D. J., Dewey, S. L., & Wolf, A. P. (1993) · Synapse · doi:10.1002/syn.890140210 · Cited by 924
Decreased striatal dopaminergic responsiveness in detoxified cocaine-dependent subjects
Volkow, N. D., Wang, G.-J., Fowler, J. S., Logan, J., Gatley, S. J., Hitzemann, R., Chen, A. D., Dewey, S. L., & Pappas, N. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/386830a0 · Cited by 854
Synaptic regulation of mesocorticolimbic dopamine neurons
White, F. J. (1996) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.19.030196.002201 · Cited by 289
Pothos, E., Rada, P., Mark, G. P., & Hoebel, B. G. (1991) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(91)91724-f · Cited by 288
Shiffman, S., Hickcox, M., Paty, J. A., Gnys, M., Kassel, J. D., & Richards, T. J. (1996) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.64.5.993 · Cited by 254
Cited by
A unified framework for addiction: Vulnerabilities in the decision process
Redish, A. D., Jensen, S., & Johnson, A. (2008) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0800472x · Cited by 501
Camí, J., & Farré, M. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra023160 · Cited by 477
One Is Not Enough: Understanding and Modeling Polysubstance Use
Crummy, E. A., O’Neal, T. J., Baskin, B. M., & Ferguson, S. M. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.00569 · Cited by 351
Daughters, S. B., Lejuez, C. W., Bornovalova, M. A., Kahler, C. W., Strong, D. R., & Brown, R. A. (2005) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.114.4.729 · Cited by 336
Profile of Executive and Memory Function Associated with Amphetamine and Opiate Dependence
Ersche, K. D., Clark, L., London, M., Robbins, T. W., & Sahakian, B. J. (2006) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300889 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Leri, F., Bruneau, J., & Stewart, J.
- Venue
- Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-12-19
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-22
- ISSN
- 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0443
- OpenAlex
- W2124668485
- Cited by
- 790
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 12.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding polydrug use: review of heroin and cocaine co‐use. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00236.x
- The paper
- Leri, F., Bruneau, J., & Stewart, J. (2003). Understanding polydrug use: review of heroin and cocaine co‐use. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00236.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.