Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 553

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A meta‐analysis of estimated genetic and environmental effects on smoking behavior in male and female adult twins

Li, Ming D., Cheng, Rong, Ma, Jennie Z., Swan, Gary E.·2003·Addiction

Abstract

Background Numerous twin studies on smoking behavior have shown that genetic and environmental factors play significant and approximately equal roles in the determination of smoking initiation (SI) and smoking persistence (SP). However, estimates of heritability (h2), shared (c2) and unique environmental effects (e2) from the literature display considerable variability for SI and SP, due most probably to differences in statistical analysis models, age, gender, sample size, origin of cohorts and measurement of smoking behavior. Methods A systematic literature search identified six studies for SI and 10 studies for SP. Data from these studies were obtained and re‐analysed by meta‐analytical techniques. Results For SI, our results indicate that the parameters h2, c2 and e2 are (mean ± SEM): 0.37 ± 0.04, 0.49 ± 0.04 and 0.17 ± 0.03 in male adults, and 0.55 ± 0.04, 0.24 ± 0.06 and 0.16 ± 0.01 in female adults, respectively. These values were weighted by a combination of original estimates of variance from studies reporting variances plus estimated variances from studies where variances were not reported (called the combined variance method). Using the same approach for SP, we found that the parameters h2, c2 and e2 weighted by the combined variance method for the phenotype are (mean ± SEM): 0.59 ± 0.02, 0.08 ± 0.04 and 0.37 ± 0.03 in male adults, and 0.46 ± 0.12, 0.28 ± 0.08 and 0.24 ± 0.07 in female adults, respectively. Conclusions Our results indicate that genetic factors play a more significant role for SI but a less significant role for SP in female adults compared to male adults. Significant gender difference was also detected in shared environmental factors for SI and SP. However, no significant gender difference was detected for e2 for either phenotype. These findings suggest that genetic and environmental factors may contribute differently to the determination of smoking initiation and persistence in male and female smokers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00295.x

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Cited by

See all 553

Metadata

Authors
Li, M. D., Cheng, R., Ma, J. Z., & Swan, G. E.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-12-19
Volume
98
Issue
1
Pages
23-31
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2117240999
Cited by
553
References
42
FWCI
8.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A meta‐analysis of estimated genetic and environmental effects on smoking behavior in male and female adult twins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00295.x
The paper
Li, M. D., Cheng, R., Ma, J. Z., & Swan, G. E. (2003). A meta‐analysis of estimated genetic and environmental effects on smoking behavior in male and female adult twins. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00295.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.