Cited by 119Smoking Behavior and CessationOccupational Health and Safety in WorkplacesWorkplace Health and Well-being

Four‐year follow‐up of smoke exposure, attitudes and smoking behaviour following enactment of Finland's national smoke‐free work‐place law

Heloma, Antero, Jaakkola, Maritta S.·2003·Addiction

Abstract

Aims This study evaluated the possible impact of national smoke‐free work‐place legislation on employee exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), employee smoking habits and attitudes on work‐place smoking regulations. Design Repeated cross‐sectional questionnaire surveys and indoor air nicotine measurements were carried out before, and 1 and 3 years after the law had come into effect. Setting Industrial, service sector and office work‐places from the Helsinki metropolitan area, Finland. Participants A total of 880, 940 and 659 employees (response rates 70%, 75% and 75%) in eight work‐places selected from a register kept by the Uusimaa Regional Institute of Occupational Health to represent various sectors of public and private work‐places. Measurements Reported exposure to ETS, smoking habits, attitudes on smoking at work and measurements of indoor air nicotine concentration. Findings Employee exposure to ETS for at least 1 hour daily decreased steadily during the 4‐year follow‐up, from 51% in 1994 to 17% in 1995 and 12% in 1998. Respondents’ daily smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption diminished 1 year after the enforcement of legislation from 30% to 25%, and remained at 25% in the last survey 3 years later. Long‐term reduction in smoking was confined to men. Both smokers’ and non‐smokers’ attitudes shifted gradually towards favouring a total ban on smoking at work. Median indoor airborne nicotine concentrations decreased from 0.9 µg/m 3 in 1994–95 to 0.1 µg/m 3 in 1995–96 and 1998. Conclusions This is the first follow‐up study on a nationally implemented smoke‐free work‐place law. We found that such legislation is associated with steadily reducing ETS exposure at work, particularly at work‐places, where the voluntary smoking regulations have failed to reduce exposure. The implementation of the law also seemed to encourage smokers to accept a non‐smoking work‐place as the norm.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00429.x

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heloma, A., & Jaakkola, M. S.
Affiliations
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FI)
Corresponding author
Heloma, Antero
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-08
Volume
98
Issue
8
Pages
1111-1117
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2007139271
Cited by
119
References
11
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Työsuojelurahasto
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
environmental tobacco smoke, smoking prevalence, smoking behavior, gender differences in smoking, Finland
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Adolescent, Adult, Attitude to Health, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Finland, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nicotine, Smoking, Tobacco Smoke Pollution, Occupational Exposure, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review