Cited by 27Smoking Behavior and CessationGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyPublic Health Policies and Education

Location Restrictions on Smoking: Assessing their Differential Impacts and Consequences in the Workplace

Open access
Bell, Kirsten, McCullough, Lucy, Devries, Karen, Jategaonkar, Natasha, Greaves, Lorraine, Richardson, Lindsay·2009·Canadian Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives To analyze existing evidence on the impact of two types of location restrictions on smoking: workplace bans and bans in hospitality settings, and to assess the extent to which they differentially affect subpopulations.Methods A review of international studies on location restrictions on smoking published between 1990-2007.Results Although workplace smoking bans reduce exposure to second-hand smoke (SHS) at work, their effects on overall cigarette consumption and smoking prevalence may be uneven across the population. Bans in hospitality settings reduce SHS exposure among workers, but have potentially uneven effects based on the interactions between gender, socio-economic status (SES) and ethnicity. The unintended consequences of smoking bans are also more likely to be experienced by low SES groups.Conclusions Although location restrictions on smoking reduce SHS exposure and may serve to positively impact smoking behaviours, there is preliminary evidence that they may have a reduced impact on subpopulations such as low-income groups, although further research is needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03405492

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bell, K., McCullough, L., Devries, K., Jategaonkar, N., Greaves, L., & Richardson, L.
Affiliations
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • British Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women's Health (CA)
Corresponding author
Bell, Kirsten
Venue
Canadian Journal of Public Health
Published
2009-01
Volume
100
Issue
1
Pages
46-50
ISSN
  • 0008-4263 (ISSN-L)
  • 1920-7476
OpenAlex
W2124146210
Cited by
27
References
38
Citations by year
2022: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Health Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
smoking bans, workplace smoking restrictions, hospitality establishments, passive smoking, cigarette consumption, smoking prevalence, unintended consequences, socioeconomic status, gender differences, ethnicity, tobacco control
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Commerce, Humans, Social Control Policies, Risk-Taking, Tobacco Smoke Pollution, Program Evaluation, Air Pollution, Indoor, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review