The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Peers and adolescent smoking
Abstract
There is a considerable body of empirical research that has identified adolescent peer relationships as a primary factor involved in adolescent cigarette smoking. Despite this large research base, many questions remain unanswered about the mechanisms by which peers affect youths’ smoking behavior. Understanding these processes of influence is key to the development of prevention and intervention programs designed to address adolescent smoking as a significant public health concern. In this paper, theoretical frameworks and empirical findings are reviewed critically which inform the current state of knowledge regarding peer influences on teenage smoking. Specifically, social learning theory, primary socialization theory, social identity theory and social network theory are discussed. Empirical findings regarding peer influence and selection, as well as multiple reference points in adolescent friendships, including best friendships, romantic relationships, peer groups and social crowds, are also reviewed. Review of this work reveals the contribution that peers have in adolescents’ use of tobacco, in some cases promoting use, and in other cases deterring it. This review also suggests that peer influences on smoking are more subtle than commonly thought and need to be examined more carefully, including consideration of larger social contexts, e.g. the family, neighborhood, and media. Recommendations for future investigations are made, as well as suggestions for specific methodological approaches that offer promise for advancing our knowledge of the contribution of peers on adolescent tobacco use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I. (1985) · Action Control · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2 · Cited by 19,057
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621794 · Cited by 10,127
Petersen, A. C., Compas, B. E., Brooks-Gunn, J., Stemmler, M., Ey, S., & Grant, K. E. (1993) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.2.155 · Cited by 788
Primary socialization theory: the etiology of drug use and deviance. I
Oetting, E. R., & Donnermeyer, J. F. (1998) · Substance Use & Misuse · doi:10.3109/10826089809056252 · Cited by 419
Donaldson, S. I., Graham, J. W., & Hansen, W. B. (1994) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf01858105 · Cited by 211
Cited by
The Developmental Context of Substance use in Emerging Adulthood
Arnett, J. J. (2005) · Journal of Drug Issues · doi:10.1177/002204260503500202 · Cited by 1,033
Campbell, R., Starkey, F., Holliday, J., Audrey, S., Bloor, M., Parry-Langdon, N., Hughes, R., & Moore, L. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60692-3 · Cited by 583
Fitzgerald, A., Fitzgerald, N., & Aherne, C. (2012) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.01.002 · Cited by 320
Defining nicotine dependence for genetic research: evidence from Australian twins
LESSOV, C. N., MARTIN, N. G., STATHAM, D. J., TODOROV, A. A., SLUTSKE, W. S., BUCHOLZ, K. K., HEATH, A. C., & MADDEN, P. A. F. (2004) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291703001582 · Cited by 185
Liu, J., Zhao, S., Chen, X., Falk, E., & Albarracín, D. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000113 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- Kobus, K.
- Venue
- Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- s1
- Pages
- 37-55
- ISSN
- 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0443
- OpenAlex
- W2007067036
- Cited by
- 702
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 13.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Peers and adolescent smoking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1360-0443.98.s1.4.x
- The paper
- Kobus, K. (2003). Peers and adolescent smoking. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.98.s1.4.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.