Cited by 190Fire effects on ecosystemsPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsForest Management and Policy

Simulating fire regimes in human-dominated ecosystems: Iberian Peninsula case study

Venevsky, Sergey, Thonicke, Kirsten, Sitch, Stephen, Cramer, Wolfgang·2002·Global Change Biology

Abstract

A new fire model is proposed which estimates areas burnt on a macro‐scale (10–100 km). It consists of three parts: evaluation of fire danger due to climatic conditions, estimation of the number of fires and the extent of the area burnt. The model can operate on three time steps, daily, monthly and yearly, and interacts with a Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (DGVM), thereby providing an important forcing for natural competition. Fire danger is related to number of dry days and amplitude of daily temperature during these days. The number of fires during fire days varies with human population density. Areas burnt are calculated based on average wind speed, available fuel and fire duration. The model has been incorporated into the Lund‐Potsdam‐Jena Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (LPJ‐DGVM) and has been tested for peninsular Spain. LPJ‐DGVM was modified to allow bi‐directional feedback between fire disturbance and vegetation dynamics. The number of fires and areas burnt were simulated for the period 1974–94 and compared against observations. The model produced realistic results, which are well correlated, both spatially and temporally, with the fire statistics. Therefore, a relatively simple mechanistic fire model can be used to reproduce fire regime patterns in human‐ dominated ecosystems over a large region and a long time period.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00528.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although there is a general relationship between human population density and fire activity in some regions, these variables are not necessarily linearly related, being strongly influenced by the environmental setting.

    “Although there is a general relationship between human population density and fire activity in some regions, these variables are not necessarily linearly related, being strongly influenced by the environmental setting (Venevsky et al., 2002; Syphard et al., 2007; Li et al., 2009).”

    From The human dimension of fire regimes on Earth (2011) · cites this paper as Venevsky et al., 2002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Venevsky, S., Thonicke, K., Sitch, S., & Cramer, W.
Affiliations
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Venevsky, Sergey
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-09-06
Volume
8
Issue
10
Pages
984-998
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2138044865
Cited by
190
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
fire regimes, fire modeling, fire danger, burned area estimation, human-dominated ecosystems, dynamic global vegetation models, fire-vegetation feedbacks, dry days, human population density, Iberian Peninsula, Peninsular Spain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review