The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nitrous oxide emission factors for agricultural soils in Great Britain: the impact of soil water‐filled pore space and other controlling variables
Abstract
Measurements were made of nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions from N‐fertilised ungrazed grassland and arable land at sites widely distributed across Great Britain during 1999–2001. The closed static chamber method was used throughout. Emissions varied widely throughout the year at each site, and between sites. Daily fluxes up to 1200 g N 2 O–N ha−1 d−1 were recorded. The highest annual flux was 27.6 kg N 2 O–N ha−1 at a grassland site in Wales, whereas the lowest, 1.7 kg N 2 O–N ha−1, occurred on a soil overlying chalk in southern England. The key factors affecting N 2 O emissions from agricultural soil were soil WFPS, temperature and soil NO 3––N content. On grassland, rainfall (particularly around the time of N application), with its consequent effect on water‐filled pore space (WFPS), was the main driving factor during the growing season. Annual emission factors (EFs), uncorrected for background emission, varied from 0.4 to 6.5% of the nitrogen (N) applied, covering a similar range for grassland to that found previously for sites restricted to Scotland. Continued monitoring at a grassland reference site near Edinburgh showed that annual EFs vary greatly from year to year, even with similar management, and that several years' data are required to produce a robust mean EF. The overall distribution of EFs in this and previous studies was log‐normal. The EFs for small‐grain cereals (and oilseed rape) peaked at a much lower value than those for grassland, whereas the values for leafy vegetables and potato crops fitted well into the grassland distribution. These differences in EF between various types of crop should be taken into account when compiling regional or national N 2 O emission inventories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
McSwiney, C. P., & Robertson, G. P. (2005) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01040.x · Cited by 462
Walling, E., & Vaneeckhaute, C. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111211 · Cited by 408
Aguilera, E., Lassaletta, L., Sanz-Cobena, A., Garnier, J., & Vallejo, A. (2013) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2012.09.006 · Cited by 383
Scheer, C., Grace, P. R., Rowlings, D. W., Kimber, S., & Van Zwieten, L. (2011) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-011-0759-1 · Cited by 226
Smith, K. A. (2017) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/ejss.12409 · Cited by 213
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dobbie, K. E., & Smith, K. A.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 204-218
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2102953400
- Cited by
- 506
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitrous oxide emission factors for agricultural soils in Great Britain: the impact of soil water‐filled pore space and other controlling variables. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00563.x
- The paper
- Dobbie, K. E., & Smith, K. A. (2003). Nitrous oxide emission factors for agricultural soils in Great Britain: the impact of soil water‐filled pore space and other controlling variables. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00563.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.