The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism
Abstract
The organizational and social issues associated with the development, implementation and use of computer‐based information systems have increasingly attracted the attention of information systems researchers. Interest in qualitative research methods such as action research, case study research and ethnography, which focus on understanding social phenomena in their natural setting, has consequently grown. Case study research is the most widely used qualitative research method in information systems research, and is well suited to understanding the interactions between information technology‐related innovations and organizational contexts. Although case study research is useful as a means of studying information systems development and use in the field, there can be practical difficulties associated with attempting to undertake case studies as a rigorous and effective method of research. This paper addresses a number of these difficulties and offers some practical guidelines for successfully completing case study research. The paper focuses on the pragmatics of conducting case study research, and draws from the discussion at a panel session conducted by the authors at the 8th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, September 1997 (ACIS 97), from the authors' practical experiences, and from the case study research literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A disaster for everyone to see: An interpretive analysis of a failed is project
Myers, M. D. (1994) · Accounting, Management and Information Technologies · doi:10.1016/0959-8022(94)90022-1 · Cited by 203
Cited by
Empowering Women through Social Entrepreneurship: Case Study of a Women's Cooperative in India
Datta, P. B., & Gailey, R. (2012) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00505.x · Cited by 634
University of Sydney, Tan, B., Pan, S., University of New South Wales, Lu, X., Fudan University, Huang, L., & Fudan University (2015) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00393 · Cited by 323
Exploring the role of customer relationship management (CRM) systems in customer knowledge creation
Khodakarami, F., & Chan, Y. E. (2014) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2013.09.001 · Cited by 321
A review of qualitative case methods trends and themes used in technology transfer research
Cunningham, J. A., Menter, M., & Young, C. (2017) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-016-9491-6 · Cited by 129
The Sustainability of Polycentric Information Commons1
Mindel, V., Mathiassen, L., & Rai, A. (2018) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2018/14015 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Darke, P., Shanks, G., & Broadbent, M.
- Venue
- Information Systems Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 273-289
- ISSN
- 1350-1917 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2575
- OpenAlex
- W2047547657
- Cited by
- 1,167
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 33.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2575.1998.00040.x
- The paper
- Darke, P., Shanks, G., & Broadbent, M. (1998). Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism. Information Systems Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2575.1998.00040.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.