The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The survival of silage inoculant lactic acid bacteria in rumen fluid: SURVIVAL OF LACTIC ACID BACTERIA IN RUMEN FLUID
Abstract
AIMS: To determine whether lactic acid bacteria (LAB) used in inoculants for silage can survive in rumen fluid (RF), and to identify those that survive best. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twelve commercial silage inoculants were added at 107 CFU ml-1 to strained RF (SRF) taken from dairy cows, with and without 5 g l-1 glucose and incubated in vitro at 39 degrees C. Changes in pH, LAB numbers and fermentation products were monitored for 72 h. In the inoculated RF with glucose, the pH decreased and numbers of LAB increased. The inoculants varied with regard to their effect on pH change and growth. In the SRF, both with and without glucose, the pH values of the inoculated samples were generally higher than those of the uninoculated controls throughout most of the incubation period. This may suggest a positive effect on the rumen environment. CONCLUSIONS: LAB used in silage inoculants can survive in RF in vitro. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This is the first step in studying the probiotic potential of silage LAB inoculants for dairy cattle. The survival of these LAB in RF may enable them to interact with rumen microorganisms and to affect rumen functionality.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Due to the ability to produce volatile fatty acids (e.g., acetic acid), heterofermentative species are sometimes included in silage starter cultures (Weinberg et al. 2003).”
From Trends in designing microbial silage quality by biotechnological methods using lactic acid bacteria inoculants: a minireview. (2019) · cites this paper as Weinberg et al. 2003
In the citing paper
“that LAB can survive in the rumen and could affect rumen MBY either through a direct effect on ruminal fermentation”
From Effects of feeding corn silage inoculated with microbial additives on the ruminal fermentation, microbial protein yield, and growth performance of lambs1 (2014) · cites this paper as Weinberg et al., 2003
Citations
Cites
Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant
Soest, P. J. V. (1994) · Cornell University Press eBooks · doi:10.7591/9781501732355 · Cited by 7,331
New trends and opportunities in the development and use of inoculants for silage
Weinberg, Z. G., & Muck, R. E. (1996) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.1996.tb00253.x · Cited by 509
Self-citationLactic acid bacteria, their metabolic products and interference with microbial growth
Vandenbergh, P. A. (1993) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.1993.tb00020.x · Cited by 475
Driehuis, F., Elferink, S. J. W. H. O., & Spoelstra, S. F. (1999) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00856.x · Cited by 344
Storage temperature effects on proteolysis in alfalfa silage
Muck, R. E., & Dickerson, J. T. (1988) · Transactions of the ASAE · doi:10.13031/2013.30813 · Cited by 223
Self-citationWhy Don’t Ruminal Bacteria Digest Cellulose Faster?
Weimer, P. J. (1996) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(96)76509-8 · Cited by 207
Self-citationWeinberg, Z., Ashbell, G., Hen, Y., Azrieli, A., Szakacs, G., & Filya, I. (2002) · Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/sj/jim/7000207 · Cited by 98
Self-citationKeady, T. W. J., & Steen, R. W. J. (1994) · Grass and Forage Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.1994.tb02021.x · Cited by 69
Salawu, M. B., Warren, E. H., & Adesogan, A. T. (2001) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.937 · Cited by 65
Effects of inoculant treatment on silage fermentation, digestibility and intake by growing cattle
Keady, T. W. J., Steen, R. W. J., Kilpatrick, D. J., & Mayne, C. S. (1994) · Grass and Forage Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.1994.tb02003.x · Cited by 56
Khuntia, A., & Chaudhary, L. C. (2002) · Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences · doi:10.5713/ajas.2002.188 · Cited by 45
Keady, T. W. J., & Steen, R. W. J. (1995) · Grass and Forage Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.1995.tb02317.x · Cited by 44
Antagonistic activity in plant-associated lactic acid bacteria
Müller, T., Behrendt, U., & Müller, M. (1996) · Microbiological Research · doi:10.1016/s0944-5013(96)80057-7 · Cited by 21
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- McDonald, 1991, The Biochemistry of Silage, 81
- Malik, 1998, In vitro evaluation of different probiotics as feed supplement, Indian Journal of Dairy Science, 51, 357
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biogas production: current state and perspectives
Weiland, P. (2009) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-009-2246-7 · Cited by 2,824
Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives
Muck, R. E., Nadeau, E. M. G., McAllister, T. A., Contreras-Govea, F. E., Santos, M. C., & Kung, L. (2018) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2017-13839 · Cited by 1,038
Self-citationHristov, A. N., Oh, J., Firkins, J. L., Dijkstra, J., Kebreab, E., Waghorn, G. C., Makkar, H. P. S., Adesogan, A. T., Yang, W. Z., Lee, C., et al. (2013) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2013-6583 · Cited by 1,086
Importance of lactobacilli in food and feed biotechnology
Giraffa, G., Chanishvili, N., & Widyastuti, Y. (2010) · Research in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2010.03.001 · Cited by 341
Hristov, A. N., Oh, J.-A., Lee, C., Meinen, R. J., Montes, F., OTT, T. L., Firkins, J. L., Rotz, A. C., Dell, C. J., Adesogan, C., et al. (2013) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Weinberg, Z. G., Muck, R. E., & Weimer, P. J.
- Affiliations
- Agricultural Research Organization (IL)
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-05-13
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1066-1071
- ISSN
- 1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2672
- OpenAlex
- W1553246018
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Keywords
- silage inoculants, lactic acid bacteria, rumen fluid, probiotics, dairy cattle, bacterial survival, rumen pH, glucose, in vitro incubation, rumen fermentation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bacteriological Techniques, Cattle, Fermentation, Lactobacillus, Rumen, Silage, Probiotics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
