Cited by 509Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyProbiotics and Fermented FoodsAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

New trends and opportunities in the development and use of inoculants for silage

Open access
Weinberg, Z.G., Muck, R.E.·1996·FEMS Microbiology Reviews

Abstract

Inoculants are used as silage additives to improve preservation efficiency and to enhance animal performance. In most commercially available inoculants, homofermentative lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have been used because they are fast and efficient producers of lactic acid, improving natural silage fermentation. Specific LAB inuculants may also have beneficial effects on animal performance even if there is no effect on fermentation. However, these types of inoculants are not always advantageous. They do not necessarily prevent sermentation by clostridia in moist silages, and they sometimes impair the aerobic stability of grass and small grain silages. Therefore, new criteria for silage inoculants should be established which consider the specific needs of the crop being ensiled. New approaches which are being taken to develop improved inoculants for silage include the following: (1) using LAB isolates which are more specific to the target crops; (2) inclusion of heterofermentative LAB to produce volatile fatty acids to inhibit yeasts and moulds upon aerobic exposure; (3) inclusion of organisms other than LAB in inoculants to inhibit detrimental microorganisms; (4) selection or engineering of LAB strains to inhibit specific microorganisms; and (5) cloning and expression of genes which would enable selected LAB strains to utilize polysaccharides in crops which are low in soluble carbohydrates. Many of these new strategies for formulating inoculants are being tested, but further research is needed to determine the most successful approaches.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1996.tb00253.x

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [10]10. Honig, H.H. (1991) Reducing losses during storage and unloading of silage. In: Proceedings of a Conference on Forage Conservation Towards 2000 (
  2. [16]16. Pahlow, G. (1991) Role of Inicroflora in forage conservation. In: Proceedings of a Conference on Forage Conservation Towards 2000 (PaMow, G. and Honig, H., Eds.), pp. 26-36. Braunschweig, Germany.
  3. [19]19. Muck, R.E. (1993) The role of silage additives in rnaking high quality silage In: Silage Production from Seed to Ani- mal, NRAES-67, Northeast Regional Agric. Engng. Service, pp. 106-116, Syracuse NY.
  4. [20]20. Satter, L.D., Woolford, J.A.. Jones, B.A. and Muck. R.E. (1987) Effect of bacterial inoculants on silage quality ail~i animal performance. Proceedings of the Eighth Silage Con- ference, pp. 21-22, Hurley, UK.
  5. [42]42. Daenicke, R., Rohr, K. and Honig, H. (1992) Zum Einsatz yon mit lmpkulturen behandelter Maissilage bei Mastbullen. 104 VDLUFA-Kongress. September 14-19, Gottingen, Ger- many. pp. 403-406.
  6. [46]46. Hill. H.A. (1989) Microbial ecology of lactobacilli in silage. In: Fo~d for Thought, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.. Microbial Genetic Division, Second Forage Symposium Pro- ceedings, pp. 47-64. Johnston, IA.
  7. [54]54. Weissbach, F., Kalzendorf, C., Reiter, I?,. and Kwella. M. (1991) Control of silage termentation by combined applica- tion el: inoculants and chemical agents In: Proceedings of a Conterence on Forage Conservation To;~,ai'ds 2000 (
  8. [64]64. Dawson, T.E., Rust, S.R. and Yokoyama, M.T. (1993) Ma- nipulation of silage fermentation and aerobic stability by propionic acid producing bacteria. In: Silage Production from Seed to Animal, NRAES-67, Northeast Regional Agric. En- gng. Service, pp. 96-105. Syracuse, NY.
  9. [67]67. Moran, J.P., Pullar, D. and Owen, T.R. (1993) The develop- ment of a novel bacterial inoculant to reduce mould spoilage and improve the silage fermentation in big bale silage. In: Silage Research 1993, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Silage Research (O'Kiely, P., O'Connell, M. and Murphy, J., Eds.), pp. 85-86. Dublin City University, Ireland.
  10. [68]68. Fenlon, D.R., Wilson, J. and Donald, S. (1993) The use of bacteriocin producing Pediococcus acidilactici as a silage inoculant to control contamination by listeria. In: Silage Research 1993, Proceedings of the Tenth International Con- ference on Silage Research (O'Kiely, P., O'Connell, M. and Murphy, J., Eds.), pp. 80-81. Dublin City University, Ire- land.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weinberg, Z. G., & Muck, R. E.
Affiliations
  • Agricultural Research Organization (IL)
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
Corresponding author
Weinberg, Z.G.
Venue
FEMS Microbiology Reviews
Published
1996-10
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
53-68
ISSN
  • 0168-6445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1574-6976
OpenAlex
W1987186092
Cited by
509
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 19
FWCI
6.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
FEMS Microbiology Reviews (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
silage inoculants, silage additives, homofermentative lactic acid bacteria, heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria, silage fermentation, aerobic stability, volatile fatty acids, animal performance, silage preservation, gene cloning and expression, polysaccharide utilization, grass silage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review