Cited by 32Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disordersRestless Legs Syndrome Research

Vertical inversion of the visual field and rem sleep mentation

De Koninck, Joseph, PRÉVOST, FRANÇOIS, LORTIE‐LUSSIER, MONIQUE·1996·Journal of Sleep Research

Abstract

The effects of the vertical inversion of the visual field on REM sleep mental activity were examined to explore the potential involvement of this activity in information processing. In a first experiment, four male subjects slept in the laboratory for two sessions of 6 consecutive nights: 2 adaptation nights, 2 nights of polysomnography and 2 nights of dream collection. During the days preceding Nights 3, 4, 5, 6 of each session, the subjects wore glasses which, during the second session, completely inverted (rotation of 180 degrees) their visual field. In a second experiment with four other male subjects, the order of conditions was reversed and the experimental condition (visual inversion) was introduced twice. The data of the two experiments were combined. Overall, following visual inversion, there were significant increases in the proportion of dreams containing motor and visual difficulties (P < 0.005), misfortunes (P < 0.05) and dreamer confusion (P < 0.05) and a decrease in dreamer participation (P < 0.05). Only 4 of the 8 subjects experienced incorporations of the inverted visual field into their dreams and they tended to perform better on two of three tests of adaptation to the visual inversion. The observed changes in dreams are consistent with the notion of continuity between waking and dreaming since they appear to reflect the waking preoccupation and psychological state associated with visual inversion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2869.1996.00001.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence of dreaming about tasks specifically improving daily performance on those tasks can be found for mirror tracing and reading with inverted goggles.

    “Evidence of dreaming about tasks specifically improving daily performance on those tasks can be found for things like mirror tracing131 and reading with inverted goggles on.132”

    From The overfitted brain: Dreams evolved to assist generalization (2021) · cites this paper as [132]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Koninck, J., PRÉVOST, F., & LORTIE‐LUSSIER, M.
Venue
Journal of Sleep Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-03
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
16-20
ISSN
  • 0962-1105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2869
OpenAlex
W1975585286
Cited by
32
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sleep Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Restless Legs Syndrome Research
Keywords
REM sleep, dream content
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Dreams, Humans, Male, Sleep, REM, Vertical Dimension, Visual Fields, Polysomnography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review