Cited by 111Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and Influences

Dreaming and offline memory consolidation

Open access
Wamsley, Erin J.·2014·Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports

Abstract

Converging evidence suggests that dreaming is influenced by the consolidation of memory during sleep. Following encoding, recently formed memory traces are gradually stabilized and reorganized into a more permanent form of long-term storage. Sleep provides an optimal neurophysiological state to facilitate this process, allowing memory networks to be repeatedly reactivated in the absence of new sensory input. The process of memory reactivation and consolidation in the sleeping brain appears to influence conscious experience during sleep, contributing to dream content recalled on awakening. This article outlines several lines of evidence in support of this hypothesis, and responds to some common objections.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11910-013-0433-5

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • REM dreams often feature bizarre and creative elements, mostly because they do not simply replay previous experiences.

    “Despite their realism, dreams, especially from rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep, often feature bizarre and creative elements, mostly because they do not simply replay previous experiences [5-7].”

    From How Adversarial REM Dreams May Facilitate Creativity, and Why We Become Aware of Them (2024) · cites this paper as [7]

    The section “Dreams Are Not an Accurate Replay of Waking Experience” (page unavailable) says dreams rarely replay episodes exactly and often combine fragments of different memories. The Conclusions (page unavailable) describe novel, sometimes bizarre combinations, but only suggest a possible process behind them; the paper does not establish that non-replay is mostly why REM dreams are bizarre or creative. Its “Dreams Do Not Seem Functional” section also says empirical evidence for dream creativity is lacking. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The consolidation hypothesis still views dreams themselves as epiphenomena.

    “Indeed, it is openly admitted that the consolidation hypothesis still views dreams themselves as epiphenomena.54”

    From The overfitted brain: Dreams evolved to assist generalization (2021) · cites this paper as [54]

    In “Dreams Do Not Seem Functional” (page unavailable), the paper distinguishes functional memory processing from the content of dreams and says it is unclear whether dreaming itself has a function. This supports the distinction behind the claim, but “views dreams themselves as epiphenomena” states more definitively what the paper leaves open. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The leading contemporary theory is that dreams involve memory consolidation and storage, often via a proposed form of memory replay.

    “Perhaps the leading contemporary theory is that dreams somehow involve memory consolidation and storage,53 often via a proposed form of memory replay.54”
  • According to the OBH, dreams are not epiphenomena, either in the sense of neutral evolution or in the sense of not being an expression of some other background process; rather, the point of dreams is the dreams themselves, because they provide departures away from the statistically biased input of an animal's daily life, which can assist and therefore increase performance.

    “According to this hypothesis, dreams are not epiphenomena, either in the sense of neutral evolution but also in the sense of not being an expression of some other background process, such as patterns of activity and associated experiences merely brought about by some other processing integrating new memories.54 Rather, the point of dreams is the dreams themselves, because they provide departures a”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wamsley, E. J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Wamsley, Erin J.
Venue
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
Published
2014-01-30
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
433-433
ISSN
  • 1528-4042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-6293
OpenAlex
W2088544817
Cited by
111
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (KL2TR000168)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL07901-10, T32HL007901)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH048832, R21MH098171)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
dreams, memory consolidation, sleep, memory reactivation, long-term memory storage, dream recall, memory stabilization
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Consciousness, Dreams, Eye Movements, Humans, Memory, Sleep

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review