Cited by 40Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Incorporation of fragmented visuo-olfactory episodic memory into dreams and its association with memory performance.

Open access
Plailly, J., Villalba, M., Vallat, R., Nicolas, A., Ruby, P.·2019·Scientific Reports

Abstract

The question of a possible link between dream content and memory consolidation remains open. After a comprehensive review of the literature, we present novel findings from an experiment testing whether the incorporation of recently learned stimuli into dream reports is associated with improved post-sleep memory performance. Thirty-two high dream recallers freely explored new visuo-olfactory episodes for 3 consecutive days. During the nights following each non-explicit encoding, participants wore a wrist actimeter, and woke up at 5am and their usual waking time to record their dreams (intensity of all oneiric sensory perception was assessed using scales). A total of 120 dreams were reported and elements related to the encoding phase were identified in 37 of them, either learning-related (mainly visual- and rarely olfactory-related elements), or experiment-related (lab- or experimenters-related elements). On the 4 th day, we found that participants with learning-related (n = 16) and participants with learning-related and/or experiment-related dreams (n = 21) had similar odor recognition and odor-evoked episodic memory with the other participants. However, they had significantly better visuo-spatial memory of the episodes in comparison to the other participants. Our results support the hypothesis that the learning phase is loosely incorporated into dreams and that this incorporation is associated with sleep related memory consolidation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-019-51497-y

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When recent experiences appear in dreams, even in fragmentary form, subsequent memory for those experiences is improved.

    “Importantly, when recent experiences appear in dreams, even in fragmentary form, subsequent memory for those experiences is improved.”

    From Constructive episodic simulation in dreams (2022) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Results (Memory performance; page not available) report better post-sleep visuo-spatial memory among participants with learning-related dreams, but no significant improvement in odor recognition or odor-evoked episodic memory. The Discussion describes an association between dream content and memory performance, not evidence that the dreams caused the improvement; the claim is therefore broader than the finding. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [52]Easton, A. & Eacott, M. J. In Handbook of Behavioral Neuroscience (Ekrem Dere, A. E.) Volume 18, 185–196 (Elsevier, 2008).
  2. [53]Tulving, E. In Organization of memory 381–405 (Academic Press, 1972).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Plailly, J., Villalba, M., Vallat, R., Nicolas, A., & Ruby, P.
Affiliations
Lyon 1 Université (FR)
Corresponding author
Ruby, P.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2019-10-30
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
15687-15687
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2982372911
Cited by
40
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-IDEX-0007, ANR-11-IDEX, ANR-11-LABX-0042, ANR-10, ANR-10-LABX, IDEX-0007, ANR-10-LABX-0060, 11 IDEX - 0007)
  • Université de Lyon (ANR‐11‐LABX‐0042, ANR-11-IDEX-0 0 07, ANR-10-LABX-0060)
  • Centre Lyonnais d'Acoustique, Université de Lyon (ANR10LABX0060, ANR-11-LABX-0042, ANR- 11-IDEX-0007)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
dream content, memory consolidation, episodic memory, odor recognition, visuospatial memory, dream recall, sleep
MeSH terms
Memory Consolidation, Adult, Cognition, Dreams, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Odorants, Sleep, Sleep Stages, Sleep, REM, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review