The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Empirical evaluation of preservation methods for faecal DNA
Abstract
We evaluate the relative effectiveness of four methods for preserving faecal samples for DNA analysis. PCR assays of fresh faecal samples collected from free‐ranging baboons showed that amplification success was dependent on preservation method, PCR‐product size, and whether nuclear or mitochondrial DNA was assayed. Storage in a DMSO/EDTA/Tris/salt solution (DETs) was most effective for preserving nuclear DNA, but storage in 70% ethanol, freezing at –20°C and drying performed approximately equally well for mitochondrial DNA and short (<200 bp) nuclear DNA fragments. Because faecal DNA is diluted and degraded, repeated extractions from faeces may be necessary and short nuclear markers should be employed for genotyping. A review of molecular scatology studies further suggests that three to six faeces per individual should be collected.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sequence and organization of the human mitochondrial genome
Anderson, S., Bankier, A. T., Barrell, B. G., de Bruijn, M. H. L., Coulson, A. R., Drouin, J., Eperon, I. C., Nierlich, D. P., Roe, B. A., Sanger, F., et al. (1981) · Nature · doi:10.1038/290457a0 · Cited by 9,636
Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA
Lindahl, T. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/362709a0 · Cited by 5,679
Rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids
Boom, R., Sol, C. J., Salimans, M. M., Jansen, C. L., Wertheim-van Dillen, P. M., & van der Noordaa, J. (1990) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.28.3.495-503.1990 · Cited by 5,266
Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analyses
Seutin, G., White, B. N., & Boag, P. T. (1991) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z91-013 · Cited by 1,695
Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR
Taberlet, P. (1996) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/24.16.3189 · Cited by 1,491
Ancient DNA: extraction, characterization, molecular cloning, and enzymatic amplification.
Pääbo, S. (1989) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.86.6.1939 · Cited by 1,011
Queller, D. C., Strassmann, J. E., & Hughes, C. R. (1993) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(93)90256-o · Cited by 799
Noninvasive genetic tracking of the endangered Pyrenean brown bear population
Taberlet, P., Camarra, J. ‐., Griffin, S., Uhrès, E., Hanotte, O., Waits, L. P., Dubois‐Paganon, C., Burke, T., & Bouvet, J. (1997) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1997.00251.x · Cited by 529
Kohn, M. H., & Wayne, R. K. (1997) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(97)01050-1 · Cited by 469
Self-citationDNA extraction from Pleistocene bones by a silica-based purification method
Höss, M., & Pääbo, S. (1993) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/21.16.3913 · Cited by 378
Cited by
Noninvasive genetic sampling: look before you leap
Taberlet, P., Waits, L. P., & Luikart, G. (1999) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01637-7 · Cited by 1,078
Human Gut Microbiome and Risk for Colorectal Cancer
Ahn, J., Sinha, R., Pei, Z., Dominianni, C., Wu, J., Shi, J., Goedert, J. J., Hayes, R. B., & Yang, L. (2013) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djt300 · Cited by 947
WAITS, L. P., & PAETKAU, D. (2005) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2193/0022-541x(2005)69[1419:ngstfw]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 720
INVITED REVIEW: Molecular analysis of predation: a review of best practice for DNA‐based approaches
KING, R. A., READ, D. S., TRAUGOTT, M., & SYMONDSON, W. O. C. (2008) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03613.x · Cited by 657
Noninvasive molecular tracking of colonizing wolf (Canis lupus) packs in the western Italian Alps
Lucchini, V., Fabbri, E., Marucco, F., Ricci, S., Boitani, L., & Randi, E. (2002) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01489.x · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- FRANTZEN, M. A. J., SILK, J. B., FERGUSON, J. W. H., WAYNE, R. K., & KOHN, M. H.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1423-1428
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2166933228
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 5.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Empirical evaluation of preservation methods for faecal DNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00449.x
- The paper
- FRANTZEN, M. A. J., SILK, J. B., FERGUSON, J. W. H., WAYNE, R. K., & KOHN, M. H. (1998). Empirical evaluation of preservation methods for faecal DNA. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00449.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.