Cited by 205Insect Resistance and GeneticsGenetically Modified Organisms ResearchInsect-Plant Interactions and Control

Immunological analysis of phloem sap of Bacillus thuringiensis corn and of the nontarget herbivore Rhopalosiphum padi (Homoptera: Aphididae) for the presence of Cry1Ab

Raps, A., Kehr, J., Gugerli, P., Moar, W. J., Bigler, F., Hilbeck, A.·2001·Molecular Ecology

Abstract

Phloem sap of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) corn expressing a truncated form of the B. thuringiensis delta-endotoxin Cry1Ab, sap sucking aphids feeding on Bt corn and their honeydew were analysed for presence of Cry1Ab using ELISA. Phloem sap of Bt and non-Bt corn was collected using a newly developed technique with a microcapillary being directly inserted into the phloem tubes. Using this technique, no Cry1Ab was detected in the phloem sap. In contrast, measurable concentrations of Cry1Ab in the range of 1 ppb were detected when phloem sap of pooled leaf samples was extracted using EDTA buffer. This was probably because of Cry1Ab toxin released from damaged cells. When analysing apterous adults of Rhopalosiphum padi L. and their honeydew, no Cry1Ab could be detected. In contrast, Cry1Ab was clearly detected in both larvae of the leaf chewing herbivore Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) and their faeces, showing that Cry1Ab is detectable after ingestion and excretion by herbivores. These results suggest that R. padi ingests or contains no or only very low concentrations of Cry1Ab in the range of the detection limit. In consequence it is hypothesized that R. padi as an important prey for beneficial insects in corn is unlikely to cause any harm to its antagonists due to mediating Bt toxin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01236.x

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raps, A., Kehr, J., Gugerli, P., Moar, W. J., Bigler, F., & Hilbeck, A.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • Auburn University (US)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Raps, A.
Venue
Molecular Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-02
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
525-533
ISSN
  • 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-294X
OpenAlex
W2111142657
Cited by
205
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Keywords
Bacillus thuringiensis, Cry1Ab, Bt maize, phloem sap, Rhopalosiphum padi, Spodoptera littoralis, honeydew, delta-endotoxin, genetically modified crops
MeSH terms
Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins, Animals, Aphids, Bacillus thuringiensis, Bacterial Proteins, Bacterial Toxins, Zea mays, Endotoxins, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Hemolysin Proteins, Larva, Moths, Plant Leaves, Plants, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review