Cited by 80Schizophrenia research and treatmentBipolar Disorder and TreatmentPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

First-episode psychosis in the military: A comparative study of prodromal symptoms

Tan, Hao-Yang, Ang, Yong-Guan, Tan, Hao-Yang, Ang, Yong-Guan·2001·Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study is to provide a retrospective description of prodromal symptoms of young military servicemen with first-episode psychosis, and a comparison with first-episode non-psychotic disorders. Method Thirty consecutive servicemen presenting with first-episode psychosis were studied. Thirty-four randomly selected servicemen from 123 with non-psychotic disorders served as comparison. A combination of unstructured and semistructured interviews with the patient and other informants was used to describe the prodromal symptoms. Results The most common prodromal psychotic symptoms were social withdrawal (83%); anxiety (77%); sleep disturbance (77%); disturbance in attention, concentration or memory (73%); deterioration in studies in school (70%); depressed mood (63%); odd behaviour (53%); and anger or irritability (53%). Common symptoms found in first-episode psychosis and non-psychotic patients included sleep disturbance, anxiety, depressed mood and anger or irritability. Common symptoms that were associated with the psychotic prodrome were social withdrawal (p Conclusion Cognitive disturbances and attenuated negative symptoms appear to be more specific to the psychotic prodrome in young patients with first-episode psychosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2001.00912.x

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sleep disruption was one of the most common symptoms reported in the prodrome of psychotic disorders (77%).

    “Sleep disruption was one of the most common symptoms reported in the prodrome of psychotic disorders (77%), although this is non-specific as sleep disruption was even more common (97%) in the non-psychotic clinical group.”
  • Sleep disruption was even more common (97%) in the non-psychotic clinical group than in the prodrome of psychotic disorders.

    “Sleep disruption was one of the most common symptoms reported in the prodrome of psychotic disorders (77%), although this is non-specific as sleep disruption was even more common (97%) in the non-psychotic clinical group.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tan, H.-Y., Ang, Y.-G., Tan, H.-Y., & Ang, Y.-G.
Venue
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2001-08
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
512-519
ISSN
  • 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1614
OpenAlex
W2124238472
Cited by
80
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
first-episode psychosis, prodromal symptoms, military personnel, social withdrawal, cognitive disorders, negative symptoms, young adults, non-psychotic mental disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Male, Memory Disorders, Military Personnel, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotic Disorders, Severity of Illness Index, Social Alienation, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review