Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pramipexole and pergolide in the treatment of depression in Parkinson's disease: a national multicentre prospective randomized study

Rektorová, I., Rektor, I., Bareš, M., Dostál, V., Ehler, E., Fanfrdlová, Z., Fiedler, J., Klajblová, H., Kulišt’ák, P., Ressner, P., Svátová, J., Urbánek, K., Velísková, J.·2003·European Journal of Neurology

Abstract

An 8‐month multicentre prospective randomized study aimed at comparing the effects of dopamine receptor agonists pramipexole (PPX; Mirapexin®) and pergolide (PRG; Permax®) as add‐on to L‐dopa therapy on depression [Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)] in 41 non‐demented patients (25 men, 16 women) suffering from both mild or moderate depression and advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). The assessment was performed by a blinded independent observer. Motor symptoms (UPDRS III), motor complications (UPDRS IV), activities of daily living (UPDRS II and VI) and depressive symptoms as measured by Self – Rating Depression Scale by Zung were evaluated in an open‐label design. The average value of Zung scores decreased significantly in both groups with no statistical difference between both groups. A significant decrease in the average value of MADRS scores was present only in the PPX group. The average UPDRS scores decreased significantly with no statistical difference between both groups at the comparable average total daily dose of both preparations. In both cases, the total daily dose of L‐dopa decreased significantly but the decrease was statistically more pronounced in the PRG group. Our results demonstrate the antidepressant effect of PPX in patients with PD while we can't make any conclusions with regard to antidepressant effect of PRG.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2003.00612.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 253

Metadata

Authors
Rektorová, I., Rektor, I., Bareš, M., Dostál, V., Ehler, E., Fanfrdlová, Z., Fiedler, J., Klajblová, H., Kulišt’ák, P., Ressner, P., Svátová, J., Urbánek, K., & Velísková, J.
Venue
European Journal of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-06-19
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
399-406
ISSN
  • 1351-5101 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-1331
OpenAlex
W1964951154
Cited by
253
References
4
FWCI
10.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pramipexole and pergolide in the treatment of depression in Parkinson's disease: a national multicentre prospective randomized study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1468-1331.2003.00612.x
The paper
Rektorová, I., Rektor, I., Bareš, M., Dostál, V., Ehler, E., Fanfrdlová, Z., Fiedler, J., Klajblová, H., Kulišt’ák, P., Ressner, P., Svátová, J., Urbánek, K., & Velísková, J. (2003). Pramipexole and pergolide in the treatment of depression in Parkinson's disease: a national multicentre prospective randomized study. European Journal of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-1331.2003.00612.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.