The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epidemiology of Posttraumatic Epilepsy: A Critical Review
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Problem: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of epilepsy. We need to understand its frequency and its contribution to the total spectrum of the convulsive disorders. Methods: A review of selected articles dealing with epilepsy after brain trauma was undertaken. Results: The number of epidemiologic studies of posttraumatic seizures has increased substantially over the past 40–50 years, offering steadily increasing knowledge of the frequency, natural history, and risk factors of this well‐recognized complication of TBI. In general, the incidence of posttraumatic seizures varies with the time period after injury and population age range under study, as well as the spectrum of severity of the inciting injuries, and has been reported to be anywhere from 4 to 53%. As high as 86% of patients with one seizure after TBI will have a second in the next 2 years. Longer‐term remission rates of 25–40% have been reported. Significant risk factors for the development of seizures in the first week after injury include acute intracerebral hematoma (especially subdural hematoma), younger age, increased injury severity, and chronic alcoholism. Significant risk factors for the development of seizures >1 week after TBI include seizures within the first week, acute intra‐cerebral hematoma (especially subdural hematoma), brain contusion, increased injury severity, and age >65 years at the time of injury. Conclusions: Epilepsy is a frequent consequence of brain injury in both civilian and military populations. We understand some factors associated with its development, but there remain many unanswered questions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A population-based study of seizures after traumatic brain injuries
Annegers, J. F., Hauser, W. A., Coan, S. P., & Rocca, W. A. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199801013380104 · Cited by 1,090 · cited 8×
“In many studies, early seizures occurred 50–100% more frequently in children than they did in adults with comparable injuries (7,21).”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Semple, B. D., Blomgren, K., Gimlin, K., Ferriero, D. M., & Noble-Haeusslein, L. J. (2013) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.04.001 · Cited by 2,132
Epilepsy in poor regions of the world
Newton, C. R., & Garcia, H. H. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61381-6 · Cited by 493
Christensen, J., Pedersen, M. G., Pedersen, C. B., Sidenius, P., Olsen, J., & Vestergaard, M. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60214-2 · Cited by 379
Paudel, Y. N., Shaikh, M. F., Chakraborti, A., Kumari, Y., Aledo-Serrano, Á., Aleksovska, K., Alvim, M. K. M., & Othman, I. (2018) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00628 · Cited by 311
Depression and cognitive complaints following mild traumatic brain injury
Silver, J. M., McAllister, T. W., & Arciniegas, D. B. (2009) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08111676 · Cited by 315
Metadata
- Authors
- Frey, L. C.
- Venue
- Epilepsia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-09-26
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- s10
- Pages
- 11-17
- ISSN
- 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-1167
- OpenAlex
- W1557124033
- Cited by
- 515
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.