Cited by 1,348Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesPsychological Testing and Assessment

The Mini-Cog as a screen for dementia: validation in a population-based sample

Open access
Borson, Soo, Scanlan, James M., Chen, Peijun, Ganguli, Mary·2003·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives To test the Mini-Cog, a brief cognitive screening test, in an epidemiological study of dementia in older Americans. Design A population-based post hoc examination of the sensitivity and specificity of the Mini-Cog for detecting dementia in an existing data set. Setting The Monongahela Valley in Western Pennsylvania. Participants A random sample of 1,119 older adults enrolled in the Monongahela Valley Independent Elders Survey (MoVIES). Measurements The effectiveness of the Mini-Cog in detecting independently diagnosed dementia was compared with that of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and a standardized neuropsychological battery. Results The Mini-Cog, scored by an algorithm as "possibly impaired" or "probably normal," and the MMSE, at a cutpoint of 25, had similar sensitivity (76% vs 79%) and specificity (89% vs 88%) for dementia, comparable with that achieved using a conventional neuropsychological battery (75% sensitivity, 90% specificity). Conclusion When applied post hoc to an existing population, the Mini-Cog was as effective in detecting dementia as longer screening and assessment instruments. Its brevity is a distinct advantage when the goal is to improve identification of older adults in a population who may be cognitively impaired. Prior evidence of good performance in a multiethnic community-based sample further supports its validity in the ethnolinguistically diverse populations of the United States in which widely used cognitive screens often f…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51465.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several assessment tools are available to screen for cognitive impairment, such as the Mini-Cog, Mini-Mental State Examination, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment, which may help identify individuals with dementia or those requiring neuropsychological evaluation when dementia is suspected.

    “Several assessment tools are available to screen for cognitive impairment (29,30), such as the Mini-Cog (31), Mini-Mental State Examination (32), and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (33), which may help identify individuals with dementia (who are experiencing memory loss, a decrease in executive function, and declines in their basic and instrumental activities of daily living) or those requiring”

    From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [31]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Borson, S., Scanlan, J. M., Chen, P., & Ganguli, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-09-23
Volume
51
Issue
10
Pages
1451-1454
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1553544812
Cited by
1,348
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 93 · 2025: 122 · 2024: 121 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 121 · 2021: 118 · 2020: 120 · 2019: 85 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 44
FWCI
4.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG 05136, R01AG007562, AG-7562, P50AG005136)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
Mini-Cog, dementia screening, cognitive screening tests, Mini-Mental State Examination, sensitivity and specificity, older adults, neuropsychological assessment
MeSH terms
Aged, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Neuropsychological Tests, Pennsylvania, Psychometrics, Mental Recall, Sensitivity and Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review