Cited by 199Frailty in Older AdultsCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

Slower walking speed forecasts increased postoperative morbidity and 1-year mortality across surgical specialties

Open access
Robinson, Thomas N., Wu, Daniel S., Sauaia, Angela, Dunn, Christina L., Stevens-Lapsley, Jennifer E., Moss, Marc, Stiegmann, Greg V., Gajdos, Csaba +2 more·2013·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the Timed Up and Go test and postoperative morbidity and 1-year mortality, and to compare the Timed Up and Go to the standard-of-care surgical risk calculators for prediction of postoperative complications. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, patients 65 years and older undergoing elective colorectal and cardiac operations with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. The Timed Up and Go test was performed preoperatively. This timed test starts with the subject standing from a chair, walking 10 feet, returning to the chair, and ends after the subject sits. Timed Up and Go results were grouped as fast ≤ 10 seconds, intermediate = 11-14 seconds, and slow ≥ 15 seconds. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare the 3 Timed Up and Go groups to current standard-of-care surgical risk calculators at forecasting postoperative complications. RESULTS: This study included 272 subjects (mean age of 74 ± 6 years). Slower Timed Up and Go was associated with increased postoperative complications after colorectal (fast 13%, intermediate 29%, and slow 77%; P < 0.001) and cardiac (fast 11%, intermediate 26%, and slow 52%; P < 0.001) operations. Slower Timed Up and Go was associated with increased 1-year mortality following both colorectal (fast 3%, intermediate 10%, and slow 31%; P = 0.006) and cardiac (fast 2%, intermediate 3%, and slow 12%; P = 0.039) operations. Receiver operating characteristic area under curve of the Timed Up and Go and the risk calculators for the colorectal group was 0.775 (95% CI: 0.670-0.880) and 0.554 (95% CI: 0.499-0.609), and for the cardiac group was 0.684 (95% CI: 0.603-0.766) and 0.552 (95% CI: 0.477-0.626). CONCLUSIONS: Slower Timed Up and Go forecasted increased postoperative complications and 1-year mortality across surgical specialties. Regardless of operation performed, the Timed Up and Go compared favorably to the more complex risk calculators at forecasting postoperative complications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sla.0b013e3182a4e96c

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [29]Edge SB Byrd DR Compton CC AJCC Cancer Staging Manual 7 New York, NY Springer 2010

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robinson, T. N., Wu, D. S., Sauaia, A., Dunn, C. L., Stevens-Lapsley, J. E., Moss, M., Stiegmann, G. V., Gajdos, C., Cleveland, J. C., & Inouye, S. K.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Denver VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Robinson, Thomas N.
  • Wu, Daniel S.
  • Dunn, Christina L.
  • Stiegmann, Greg V.
  • Gajdos, Csaba
  • Cleveland, Joseph C.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2013-10
Volume
258
Issue
4
Pages
582-590
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071643895
Cited by
199
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 13
FWCI
7.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (K23AG034632, P01AG031720, NIA K23AG034632, NIH P01AG031720)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K24HL089223, NIH K24 HL089223)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
Timed Up and Go test, walking speed, postoperative complications, postoperative mortality, surgical risk prediction, colorectal surgery, cardiac surgery, older adults, functional capacity, preoperative assessment, surgical risk calculator, geriatric surgery, postoperative rehabilitation, postoperative delirium, postoperative pneumonia, postoperative thromboembolism, postoperative wound complications
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Decision Support Techniques, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Humans, Male, Postoperative Complications, Preoperative Care, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, ROC Curve, Digestive System Surgical Procedures, Walking, Elective Surgical Procedures, Risk Assessment, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review