Cited by 54Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureSmart Grid Energy ManagementOptimal Power Flow Distribution

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Modelling and verifying the load behaviour of electric vehicle charging stations based on field measurements

Leou, Rong‐Ceng, Teng, Jen‐Hao, Su, Chun‐Lien·2015·IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution

Abstract

This study measures the long‐term electric energy data of an electric vehicle (EV) charging station, and uses these field measurements to analyse and construct the load behaviour model of an EV charging station. According to the statistics of field measurements, the state of charge of EV battery pack at the start of charging and the number of EVs starting charging in each time interval can be modelled using Poisson distribution, Roulette wheel selection and uniform distribution. The load behaviour of an EV charging station can be modelled and analysed accordingly. To validate the accuracy of the proposed load behaviour model, a portion of field measurements is reserved for load behaviour model verification. The proposed load behaviour model can also be used to analyse the impacts of EV charging stations on distribution systems. Test results show that the load behaviour model proposed in this study has higher accuracy and the impacts of EV charging stations on distribution systems can be analysed more effectively and precisely.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1049/iet-gtd.2014.0446

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. 10.1109/JPROC.2010.2066250 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1109/MPE.2011.941322 · DOI
  3. Dow L. Marshall M. Xu L. Aguero J.R. Willis H.L.: ‘A novel approach for evaluating the impact of electric vehicles on the power distribution system’.Proc. of IEEE PES General Meeting 2010 pp.1–6 · DOI
  4. Liu R. Dow L. Liu E.: ‘A survey of PEV impacts on electric utilities’.Proc. of IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies 2011 pp.1–8 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Taylor J. Maitra A. Alexander M. Brooks D. Duvall M.: ‘Evaluation of the impact of plug‐in electric vehicle loading on distribution system operations’.Proc. of IEEE PES General Meeting 2009 pp.1–6 · DOI
  6. Green R.C.II Wang L. Alam M.: ‘The impact of plug‐in hybrid electric vehicles on distribution networks: a review and outlook’.Proc. of IEEE PES General Meeting 2010 pp.1–8 · DOI
  7. Naranjo E.V. Vicente D.M. Sumper A. Robles R.V. Andreu A.S.: ‘Deterministic and probabilistic assessment of the impact of the electrical vehicle on the power grid’.Proc. of IEEE PES General Meeting 2011 pp.1–8 · DOI
  8. Fluhr J. Ahlert K.H. Weinhardt C.: ‘A stochastic model for simulating the availability of electric vehicles for services to the power grid’.Proc. of the 43rd Hawaii Int. Conf. on System Sciences 2011 pp.1–10 · DOI
  9. Soares F.J. Lopes J.A.P. Almeida P.M.R. Moreira C.L. Seca L.: ‘A stochastic model to simulate electric vehicles motion and quantify the energy required from the grid’.Proc. of the 17th Power Systems Computation Conf. 2011
  10. 10.1049/iet‐gtd.2013.0256 · DOI
  11. 10.1049/iet‐gtd.2013.0628 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2036481 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2049133 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1109/TSG.2012.2190307 · DOI
  15. Sortomme E. Negash A.I. Venkata S.S. Kirschen D.S.: ‘Multistate voltage dependent load model of a charging electric vehicle’.IEEE Transportation Electrification Conf. and Expo (ITEC) 2012 pp.1–5 · DOI
  16. Sortomme E. Negash A.I. Venkata S.S. Kirschen D.S.: ‘Voltage dependent load models of charging electric vehicles’.IEEE General Meeting 2013 pp.1–5 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Valle R.G. Vlachogiannis J.G.: ‘Electric vehicle demand model for load flow studies’.Electric Power Components and Systems 2009 pp.577–582 · DOI
  18. 10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2057456 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Wang S. Zhang N. Li Z. Shahidehpour M.: ‘Modeling and impact analysis of large scale V2G electric vehicles on the power grid’.IEEE PES ISGT ASIA 2012 pp.1–6 · DOI
  20. George C., 1990, Statistical inference
  21. 10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2291556 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2016072 · DOI
  23. Kuska N.G. Heitsch H. Romisch W.: ‘Scenario reduction and scenario tree construction for power management problems’.Proc. of IEEE Bologna Power Tech Conf. 2003 pp.1–7

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Leou, R., Teng, J., & Su, C.
Affiliations
  • Cheng Shiu University (TW)
  • National Sun Yat-sen University (TW)
  • National Kaohsiung Marine University (TW)
Corresponding author
Leou, Rong‐Ceng
Venue
IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution
Published
2015-08
Volume
9
Issue
11
Pages
1112-1119
ISSN
  • 1751-8687 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-8695
OpenAlex
W2054559398
Cited by
54
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IET Generation Transmission & Distribution (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 103-3113-E-110-002)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
Keywords
electric vehicle charging stations, state of charge, Poisson distribution, roulette wheel selection, uniform distribution, field measurements, distribution system impacts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review