Cited by 276Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders

Longer versus shorter daily constraint-induced movement therapy of chronic hemiparesis: An exploratory study

Open access
Sterr, Annette, Elbert, Thomas, Berthold, Irina, Kölbel, Sabine, Rockstroh, Brigitte, Taub, Edward·2002·Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective To evaluate and compare the effects of 3-hour versus 6-hour daily training sessions in constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT).Design Intervention study, 2-group randomized trial; baseline, pretreatment, and posttreatment measures; 1-month follow-up (weekly measures).Setting University department of psychology in Germany.Participants A convenience sample of 15 adults with chronic hemiparesis (13 stroke, 2 traumatic brain injury).Intervention CIMT (14 consecutive days; constraint of unaffected hand for a target of 90% of waking hours) with either 6 hours (6h/d group, n=7) or 3 hours (3h/d group, n=8) of shaping training with the affected hand per day.Main outcome measures The Motor Activity Log and Wolf Motor Function Test.Results Significant improvements in motor function in the laboratory and increased use of the affected hand in the real-world environment were found in both groups. The beneficial effects were significantly greater in the 6h/d group than in the 3h/d group.Conclusion The 3-hour CIMT training schedule significantly improved motor function in chronic hemiparesis, but it was less effective than the 6-hour training schedule.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/apmr.2002.35108

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Restraining movements of nonimpaired limbs may reduce hyperreliance on healthy limbs and improve impaired limbs.

    “Restraining movements of nonimpaired limbs may reduce hyperreliance on healthy limbs and improved impaired limbs (Kolb, 1995;Ogden & Franz, 1917;Ostendorf & Wolf, 1981;Royet, 1991;Sterr et al., 2002;Wolf, Lecraw, Barton, & Jann, 1989).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Peter e, Leidner O. Forced-use-Therpie in der Rehabilitation von Patienten mit Halbseitenliihmung-eine Modifikation fUr die kli- nische Praxis. Neurol Rehabil 1997;3:137•44.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sterr, A., Elbert, T., Berthold, I., Kölbel, S., Rockstroh, B., & Taub, E.
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Venue
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-10
Volume
83
Issue
10
Pages
1374-1377
ISSN
0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063865263
Cited by
276
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 29
FWCI
13.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Keywords
constraint-induced movement therapy, chronic hemiparesis, stroke, traumatic brain injury, training duration, motor recovery, hand use, Motor Activity Log, Wolf Motor Function Test
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Adult, Aged, Brain Injuries, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Paresis, Task Performance and Analysis, Physical Therapy Modalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review