Cited by 202Liver Diseases and ImmunityPediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and TreatmentsFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research

The true impact of fatigue in primary biliary cirrhosis: A population study

Open access
Goldblatt, Jennifer, Taylor, Philip J.S., Lipman, Toby, Prince, Martin I., Baragiotta, Anna, Bassendine, Margaret F., James, Oliver F.W., Jones, David E.J.·2002·Gastroenterology

Abstract

Background & aims Patient surveys suggest that fatigue is a common problem in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). The actual extent of the problems caused by fatigue in PBC has yet to be determined as previous studies addressing this question have tended to use selected patient subgroups and subjective or non-quantitative fatigue assessment tools. Here, we have attempted to more accurately assess the extent of fatigue in PBC, and the specificity of the symptom for this disease, by the application of an objective measure of fatigue impact (the fatigue impact score [FIS]) to a geographically based patient cohort, age- and sex-matched normal controls, and chronic liver disease controls. Methods Postal completion of the FIS and linked symptom assessment tools. Results Median FIS was significantly higher in patients (n = 136) than community controls (40 [0-138] vs. 28 [0-156]; P < 0.0001) and chronic liver disease controls (n = 38) (20.5 [0-145]; P < 0.05). Fatigue scores in the 11 patients who had undergone liver transplantation (median 3.5 years previously) were the same as those in non-transplanted patients with advanced disease. Conclusions Fatigue is a significant and specific problem in PBC. It is not, however, universal and affects fewer patients than has previously been thought to be the case based on data from selected patient cohorts. This definition of the "normal range" for fatigue in PBC will assist in future studies of etiology and therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/gast.2002.32993

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldblatt, J., Taylor, P. J. S., Lipman, T., Prince, M. I., Baragiotta, A., Bassendine, M. F., James, O. F. W., & Jones, D. E. J.
Affiliations
Newcastle University (GB)
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-05
Volume
122
Issue
5
Pages
1235-1241
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054440991
Cited by
202
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
Keywords
primary biliary cirrhosis, fatigue, objective fatigue assessment, chronic liver disease, liver transplantation, symptom burden
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chronic Disease, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary, Liver Diseases, Male, Middle Aged, Liver Transplantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review