Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Brain Responses to Visceral Stimuli Reflect Visceral Sensitivity Thresholds in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Open access
Larsson, Mats B.O., Tillisch, Kirsten, Craig, A.D., Engström, Maria, Labus, Jennifer, Naliboff, Bruce, Lundberg, Peter, Ström, Magnus, Mayer, Emeran A., Walter, Susanna A.·2012·Gastroenterology

Abstract

Background & aims Only a fraction of IBS patients show increased perceptual sensitivity to rectal distension, suggesting possible differences in processing and/or modulation of visceral afferent signals within this group. The aim was to identify brain mechanisms which may underlie these perceptual differences. Methods 44 women with IBS and 20 female healthy control subjects (HCs) were included. Symptom severity in IBS was determined by Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS). Anxiety and depression symptoms were assessed using the Hospital anxiety & depression score (HAD). Blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signals were measured by functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) during expectation and delivery of high (45mmHg) and low (15mmHg) intensity rectal distensions. Perception thresholds to rectal distension were determined in the scanner. Brain imaging data from 18 normosensitive, 15 hypersensitive IBS patients and 18 HCs were compared. Results were reported significant if peak p-value ≤ 0.05 with family wise error correction in regions of interest. Results The two IBS subgroups were similar in age, symptom duration, psychological symptoms and IBS symptom severity. While brain responses to distension were similar in normosensitive patients and HCs, hypersensitive IBS demonstrated greater activation of insula and reduced deactivation in pregenual anterior cingulate cortex during noxious rectal distensions, compared to both HCs and normosensitive IBS. During expectation of rectal distension, normosensitive IBS had more activation in right hippocampus than HCs. Conclusions Despite similarities in symptoms, hyper- and normosensitive IBS patients differed substantially in cerebral response to standardized rectal distensions and their expectation, consistent with differences in ascending visceral afferent input.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.11.022

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Larsson, M. B. O., Tillisch, K., Craig, A. D., Engström, M., Labus, J., Naliboff, B., Lundberg, P., Ström, M., Mayer, E. A., & Walter, S. A.
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
142
Issue
3
Pages
463-472.e3
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974317184
Cited by
170
References
19
FWCI
13.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brain Responses to Visceral Stimuli Reflect Visceral Sensitivity Thresholds in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/j.gastro.2011.11.022
The paper
Larsson, M. B. O., Tillisch, K., Craig, A. D., Engström, M., Labus, J., Naliboff, B., Lundberg, P., Ström, M., Mayer, E. A., & Walter, S. A. (2012). Brain Responses to Visceral Stimuli Reflect Visceral Sensitivity Thresholds in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2011.11.022

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.