Cited by 372Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentLiver Diseases and ImmunityLiver physiology and pathology

Association of histologic disease activity with progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Open access
Kleiner, David E., Brunt, Elizabeth M., Wilson, Laura A., Behling, Cynthia, Guy, Cynthia, Contos, Melissa, Cummings, Oscar, Yeh, Matthew +13 more·2019·JAMA Network Open

Abstract

Importance: The histologic evolution of the full spectrum of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and factors associated with progression or regression remain to be definitively established. Objective: To evaluate the histologic evolution of NAFLD and the factors associated with changes in disease severity over time. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective cohort substudy from the Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network (NASH CRN) NAFLD Database study, a noninterventional registry, was performed at 8 university medical research centers. Masked assessment of liver histologic specimens was performed, using a prespecified protocol to score individual biopsies. Participants included 446 adults with NAFLD enrolled in the NASH CRN Database studies between October 27, 2004, and September 13, 2013, who underwent 2 liver biopsies 1 or more year apart. Data analysis was performed from October 2016 to October 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Progression and regression of fibrosis stage, using clinical, laboratory, and histologic findings, including the NAFLD activity score (NAS) (sum of scores for steatosis, lobular inflammation, and ballooning; range, 0-8, with 8 indicating more severe disease). Results: A total of 446 adults (mean [SD] age, 47 [11] years; 294 [65.9%] women) with NAFLD (NAFL, 86 [19.3%]), borderline NASH (84 [18.8%]), and definite NASH (276 [61.9%]) were studied. Over a mean (SD) interval of 4.9 (2.8) years between biopsies, NAFL resolved in 11 patients (12.8%) and progressed to steatohepatitis in 36 patients (41.9%). Steatohepatitis resolved in 24 (28.6%) of the patients with borderline NASH and 61 (22.1%) of those with definite NASH. Fibrosis progression or regression by at least 1 stage occurred in 132 (30%) and 151 [34%] participants, respectively. Metabolic syndrome (20 [95%] vs 108 [72%]; P = .03), baseline NAS (mean [SD], 5.0 [1.4] vs 4.3 [1.6]; P = .005), and smaller reduction in NAS (-0.2 [2] vs -0.9 [2]; P < .001) were associated with progression to advanced (stage 3-4) fibrosis vs those without progression to stage 3 to 4 fibrosis. Fibrosis regression was associated with lower baseline insulin level (20 vs 33 μU/mL; P = .02) and decrease in all NAS components (steatosis grade -0.8 [0.1] vs -0.3 [0.9]; P < .001; lobular inflammation -0.5 [0.8] vs -0.2 [0.9]; P < .001; ballooning -0.7 [1.1] vs -0.1 [0.9]; P < .001). Only baseline aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels were associated with fibrosis regression vs no change and progression vs no change on multivariable regression: baseline AST (regression: conditional odds ratio [cOR], 0.6 per 10 U/L AST; 95% CI, 0.4-0.7; P < .001; progression: cOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5; P = .002). Changes in the AST level, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level, and NAS were also associated with fibrosis regression and progression (ΔAST level: regression, cOR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.6-1.2; P = .47; progression, cOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.6; P = .02; ΔALT level: regression, cOR, 0.7 per 10 U/L AST; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9; P = .002; progression, cOR, 1.0 per 10 U/L AST; 95% CI, 0.9-1.2; P = .93; ΔNAS: regression, cOR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.6-0.9; P = .001; progression, cOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: Improvement or worsening of disease activity may be associated with fibrosis regression or progression, respectively, in NAFLD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12565

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a natural history cohort of 445 individuals with 4.9 years mean follow-up between paired liver biopsies from the NASH CRN, improvement in the NAS over time was associated with fibrosis regression.

    “In a natural history cohort of 445 individuals with 4.9 years mean follow-up between paired liver biopsies from the NASH CRN, improvement in the NAS over time was associated with fi brosis regression, and worsening of the NAS was associated with fi brosis progression. 260”

    From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [260]

    The Results section reports that improvement in NAS was associated with fibrosis regression and worsening with progression. The Methods identify a noninterventional NASH CRN registry, and the biopsy intervals in the Results table are consistent with an overall mean of about 4.9 years. The cohort count is misstated: the paper reports 446 adults, not 445 (page numbers unavailable in our copy). (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several studies have shown that changes in histologically assessed activity are linked with changes in fibrosis over time.

    “Several studies have shown that changes in histologically assessed activity are linked with changes in fi brosis over time.”
  • In the same cohort, worsening of the NAS was associated with fibrosis progression.

    “In a natural history cohort of 445 individuals with 4.9 years mean follow-up between paired liver biopsies from the NASH CRN, improvement in the NAS over time was associated with fi brosis regression, and worsening of the NAS was associated with fi brosis progression. 260”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kleiner, D. E., Brunt, E. M., Wilson, L. A., Behling, C., Guy, C., Contos, M., Cummings, O., Yeh, M., Gill, R., Chalasani, N., Neuschwander-Tetri, B. A., Diehl, A. M., Dasarathy, S., Terrault, N., Kowdley, K., Loomba, R., Belt, P., Tonascia, J., Lavine, J. E., Sanyal, A. J., & for the Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
  • Division of Gastroenterology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Swedish Medical Center (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Kleiner, David E.
  • Sanyal, Arun J.
Venue
JAMA Network Open
Published
2019-10-04
Volume
2
Issue
10
Pages
e1912565
ISSN
2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2977362851
Cited by
372
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 2
FWCI
32.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Purdue University Indianapolis (Indiana University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000100, UL1TR000423, UL1TR000436, UL1TR000058, UL1TR000004, UL1TR000448, UL1TR000006, UL1TR000439, UL1TR002548, UL1TR001442, UL1TR002345, UL1TR002319)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U01DK061730, U01DK061731, U01DK061713, U24DK061730, U01DK061728, U01DK061737, U01DK061732, U01DK061734, U01DK061718, U01DK061738)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
Keywords
non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, disease progression, fibrosis regression, NAFLD activity score, metabolic syndrome, steatosis, lobular inflammation, ballooning, liver biopsy
MeSH terms
Academic Medical Centers, Adult, Aspartate Aminotransferases, Female, Humans, Liver, Liver Cirrhosis, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, United States, Cohort Studies, Weight Gain, Disease Progression, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review